Quantcast
Channel: Unknown Gender History
Viewing all 1778 articles
Browse latest View live

Alimony Racketeering in the Social Justice Paradise of the Soviet Union - 1926

$
0
0

FULL TEXT: MOSCOW, Russia, Oct. 23.— Moscow courts have just passed severe sentences on three women, an “alimony widow” and two female accomplices for fraudulent use of the statute requiring the father of a child to pay one-third of his salary to its support.

The court, taking note of the increasing popularity of the form of fraud, announced that strict steps would be taken hereafter to protect the right of the helpless male population.

The number of so-called “alimony widows” in the Soviet Union has become legion. As the government newspaper, “Izvestia,” says, “They are constantly on the increase. It seems that with them it has become a sort of sport as well as business, a sort of life entertainment.”

~ Live In Luxury. ~

There are women who have five or six children, each from a different father.

But all the fathers have to pay the wife one-third of their wages for the support of the child. Such an alimony widow lives in luxury.

The three women recently sentenced, however, came to grief by being too greedy. Maria Sukhom­lina was married to a poor man.

When their first child came, Maria, envying the affluence of certain friends of hers who had learned the trick of becoming “alimony widows,” determined to choose a richer father for her baby than its real one was.

She picked on a wealthy neighbor, Mr. Vorovsky, a merchant. True, Mr. Vorovsky as a matter of fact had never seen her, but Maria knew I how to attend to that. She conferred with two of her women friends and told them her plan.

~ Hatched Plot. ~

“If I can get the court to recognize Mr. Vorovsky as the baby’s father, he will have to pay me at least 100 roubles a month, and out of that sum I will buy you both new dresses.”

With this inducement, the two agreed to swear to their personal knowledge of her “affair” with Mr. Vorovsky.

The latter, completely dumbfounded at the charge, defended himself vigorously, and when the court, finding him guilty, ordered him to pay alimony, lie refused and was sent to jail.

A month passed, and since Maria had no money with which to fulfill her promises to her friends, they grew disgruntled, and finally, with very little show of caution for their own interests, “squealed” to the authorities.

Maria and her two friends were arrested, Mr. Vorovsky was released, and the three women were sentenced to serve two years in jail.

[“Rich Russian Saved From Alimony Fraud - Women Get Punishment For Deceit - Defendant Claimed Wealthy Man Was Father Of Her Child. - 2 Witnesses Confess Plot – Many Widows Throughout Soviet are Living in Luxury.” Syndicated (INS), El Paso Herald (Tx.), Oct. 23, 1926, p. 1]

***


***


For more revelations of this suppressed history, see The Alimony Racket: Checklist of Posts

***

A Girl Called Bonhours (Bouhours): French Serial Killer, Executed – Late 1790s

$
0
0


NOTE: The spelling of the name is in question: “Bonhours” or “Bouhours.” The earliest mention of the case, identifying the criminal as female, found so far is dated 1835. A mention from 1824, however, describes the perpetrator as male. The famous 19th century criminologist Cesar Lombroso mentioned the case in 1895, giving the name as Bonhours. While the following long New York Times article dating from 1866 does not give the female serial killer’s name, it is clear that the case is that mentioned by Lombroso. The 1866 article also allows us to date the case as occurring circa 1795-1799. Oddly, the title of the article includes the statement that she killed twenty men in a period of four months, yet these assertions are not included in the body of the article itself.

***


FULL TEXT: Byline – Ralph Easel (New York Times Paris correspondent) -- In a recent letter I gave some account Philippe, the man who is now in confinement at Mazas (the Paris Tombs), awaiting trial for the perpetuation of eighteen assassinations. The patrons of our melo-dramatic theatres complain that the authors who cater to t to their peculiar taste are deficient in imagination, and are continually serving up to them the same old play, with the same old incidents of plot, only rehashed and transposed, with no more than a change of a title. So it is with the crimes of real life, as well as those of the mimic scene – there is nothing new under the sun. The wretch Probst, no doubt, seems to you in America, the most ferocious incarnation of the sanguinary villain but the Frenchman, Phillippe, far outstrips in flagitious cruelty the German assassin of Philadelphia, and even Philippe himself is but a plugiary, so far as the number of his unfortunate victims is concerned, of a woman who signalized hereself in Paris during the rule of the Directory [1795-1800].

One day, at the period mentioned, the proprietor of a furnished hotel in the Rue de 1’Universite, appeared before the Minister of Police, and informed that functionary that a murder had been committed in his (the hotel keeper’s) house. On the previous evening, he said, a stranger had taken a room stating his residence to be Melun, and his purpose to spend two or three days in Paris. After ordering his baggage to be carried to his apartment, the new comer went out, giving notice that be was going to the Odeon Theatre, and should not return to the hotel until after, the performance. Near midnight he reappeared, accompanied by a young and very pretty woman, dressed in male attire, who he, said, was his wife.

The next morning, at an early hour, the pretended sposa left the house, requesting that her husband might not be disturbed until her return which would be in about an hour. At noon she was still absent, and hearing nothing stirring in her room occupied by the gentleman from Melun, the landlord began to feel uneasy, and rapped at the strangers door. --- Receiving no answer from within, the hotel keeper sent for a duplicate key to the apartment, upon entering which the unfortunate man was found lifeless in his bed. A doctor was hastily summoned, who, after a brief examination of the body, declared that death had been produced by a blow at the left temple, inflicted by a blunt instrument.

It was evident that the assassination had been committed by the woman in male attire, and every effort was made by the police to discover her whereabouts, but ineffectually. A month subsequently, another murder was under similar circumstances, except that on this occasion the victim, also a traveler, had gone to his room quite alone. At a late hour, however, an effeminate looking young man came down stairs, and was let out by the porter of the hotel, who remembered the fact on the following morning when the date was discovered. The affair caused great excitement in Paris, and redoubled exertions were made by the police to ferret out the mysterious assassin, but still without result. Eleven days afterward, a third victim perished in precisely the same manner as the preceding two, and in the course of a few months, no less than twenty men lost their lives by means so identical that no doubt was entertained that the murderous blows were all inflicted by the same hand.

Stung to the quick, [Joseph] Fouche, the Minister of Police, set all his spies to work, and offered a large reward for the discovery of those unparalleled crimes.

One evening a certain B., a member of the Secret Police, who had the appearance of a Provincial gentleman, was passing through a narrow street of the City, when he encountered a handsome, equivocal-looking youth. B. stopped, turned, and said to himself,

“That’s a woman in male garb. If it should be she!

At the tame moment the handsome woman also turned, and smiled encouragingly.

“That settles the question,” murmured the delighted spy. “Now, if I can manage the thing cautiously, my fortune is made. “And retracing his steps, he accosted the unknown;

“I have something very particular to say to you,” whispered B., with a knowing leer, “ but it is not possible for us to talk freely in the public street. Might I not invite you to accompany me to my hotel?”

“I suppose you take me to be a woman?” was the soft voice. “You are quite mistaken my good sir! I don’t mind having a chat with you, however; where are you staying?”

“ In the Rue del’Universite!”

“ Indeed! I am too well known to go there.”

“I am on the right track,” thought the spy. “Well, than, he said aloud, “we will go wherever you like.”

“Done,” replied the other.

And, crossing the river, the pair presently entered a small hotel on the Place de Chatelet engaged an apartment, and ordered supper to be served in their room.

“If I am to remain with yon during your stay in Paris,” said the young woman, who no longer attempted to conceal her sex, “you had better have your baggage brought here.”

B., overjoyed at the opportunity thus offered  to lodge the necessary information at the Central Police Station near by, at once assented to this suggestion, and declared that he would go himself, pay his bill, and bring a box of silks he had at the other hotel. After an hour’s absence be returned, accompanied by two porters, carrying on their shoulders a large and apparently heavy box, which they deposited in the corner of the room. The supper: previously ordered was now served.

“Your walk must bare made you thirsty,” said the young woman, pouring out a glass of wine for her companion. “ But, before you sit down, have the kindness to give me my handkerchief, which I have left over there on the sofa.”

Suspecting some trick, B., while crossing the room, watched his new. Acquaintance closely, and saw her throw a powder into the glass of wine, which, instead of swallowing  be dexterously managed to spill on the carpet. In a few moments be showed signs of drowsiness and began to murmur incoherent words. Drawing the syren near him, be felt something in her packet which excited his curiosity. Upon asking what it was, she produced the object, a beautiful little hammer.

“This,” said she, “is an opiate of the most powerful description. I’ll show you presently how it puts people to sleep.”

B. had fallen to the floor, in an apparent state of complete unconsciousness. Stooping over him the murderess raised her anticipated victim’s bead, placed it in the most favorable position to render the blow effective, and had already seized the pretty little  hammer, when suddenly the box in the corner flew open with a loud noise, and a grip of iron seized her uplifted arm.

On the trial, which took place shortly afterward, the female assassin alleged, in her defense, that the bad been ruined by a villain and had sworn to be avenged upon the entire male sex. This romantic story, however, did not prevent her conviction and subsequent death on the scaffold.

[“Ralph Easel, “Making a Hero of an Assassin – Terrible Career of a Murderess – She Kills Twenty Men within Four Months,” New York Times (N.Y.), Jun. 1, 1866, page = ?; (reprinted in many other US newspapers)]

***
Following are some fragmentary sources:

***

[A] girl, called Bonhours, who was executed in Paris at the age of twenty-two, for robbing and murdering several people, is described as of remarkable muscular strength, and her favourite weapon was a hammer!

[Isabel Foard, “The Criminal: Is He Produced by Environment or Atavism?” The Westminster Review, Jul.-Dec. 1898, Vol. 150, (pp. 90-103), p. 97]

***

The celebrated Bonhours, a prostitute and murderess who wore masculine garments, and was as strong as a man, killed several men by blows from a hammer.

[Caesar Lombroso & William Ferrero, The Female Offender, 1895, p. 131]

***

EXCERPT: The following mention is extracted from a discussion of phrenological descriptions:

“in another criminal, to whom murder had become a habit; in Bouhours, who killed her victims with a hammer, in order to rob them of their money … In Bouhours, three organs had acquired a high degree of development. The excessive activity of one produced a propensity to steal; of the second, to murder; and of the third, to fight;—an unhappy concourse, which can only explain the atrocious conduct of this monster.”

[François Joseph Gall, Organology, Or, An Exposition of the instincts, propensities, sentiments, talents, or of the moral qualities, and the fundamental intellectual faculties in man and animals and the seat of their organs.” 1835, Vol. 4 of 6 vols., Marsh, Capen & Lyon (Boston), p. 111-12]

***

The following reference to the case, from 1824, gives the sex of the criminal as male.

“in Bonhours, who felled his victim with a mallet, to rob them of their money.”

[The Phrenological Journal and Miscellany, Volume 1, Dec. 1823 – Aug. 1824, p. 30]

***


For similar cases, see: Female Serial Killer Bandits

***

Roberta Elder, Prolific Georgia Serial Killer of Family Members - 1952

$
0
0

The suspected victims of Roberta Elder include 3 husbands (including “Common law husband”), 4 of her children, 3 step-children, her mother, her grandchild, a cousin, and the former wife of a husband. (See list at end of this post)

***

FULL TEXT (Article 1 of 7): Atlanta – Police sought today to determine whether a 43-year-old Negro woman, jailed for the poison death of her husband and a step-child, also did away with 10 other relatives for insurance money.

Roberta Elder was charged with murder yesterday by order of a coroner’s jury after a state expert testified that her husband the Rev. William Elder, died of arsenic poisoning Aug. 21.

The woman’s step-daughter, 9-year old Pearl Elder, also died of arsenic poisoning Jan. 11 1951, City Detective J. E. Helms said.

The other deaths in her family since 1948 include her mother, two previous husbands, three of her children and another step-child.

Helms told the coroner’s jury that the woman took out insurance policies ranging from $50 to $3,000 on most of the persons whose death is being investigated.

[“Negro Woman Jailed For Poison Deaths of Husband, Child,” syndicated (AP), Waycross Journal-Herald (Ga.), Sep. 20, 1952, p. 2]

***

FULL TEXT (Article 2 of 7): Atlanta – Tagged as “Mrs. Bluebeard” by local police, Mrs. Roberta Elder, 43, is being held here as a suspect in thirteen deaths which may have been caused by poisoning.

Police say that thirteen relatives of Mrs. Elder have probably died from arsenic poison seasoning of food during the last fourteen years. Among the dead was listed the name of Mrs. Nora Scott Harris, a 94-year-old friend who lived at the 1328 Eason Street home and who died on Dec. 22, 1951.

Coroner's physicians, who examined death certificates, concluded that all of the listed causes of death in the suspected foul play cases, such as pneumonia and food poisoning, could be manifestations of arsenic poisoning.

The list of other deaths being investigated by police is as follows:

THE REV. WILLIAM M. ELDER Sr. – late husband of the suspect, whose death according to State Toxicologist Herman Jones was caused by arsenic poisoning.

ANNIE PEARL ELDER, 9 – daughter of the minister by a previous marriage, whose death, officials say, came front arsenic poisoning on Jan. 11, 1951.

MRS. KELLY BROWN  – mother of the suspect, who died here in 1945.

WILLIE MAE THURMOND – 2-week-old daughter by her first marriage.

LIZZIE MAY THURMOND – one week-old daughter by her first marriage. (Both children died when the mother lived in the rear of a Harris Street address)

JOHN WOODWARD, 36 – common law husband of Mrs. Elder, who died of an undetermined cause in 1938.

WILLIE THURMOND, 12 – who died in 1939 from malnutrition and respiratory trouble a recorded on the death certificate.

JIMMY LEE CRANE HUNTER, 2 – grandson of Mrs. Elder by a previous marriage, who died in 1943.

GLORIA EVANS – the suspected woman's cousin, who died from food poisoning Dec. 26, 1944.

JAMES GARFIELD CRANE, 45 – her husband by a previous marriage, who died in 1947 from food poising.

MRS. WILLIE MAE ELDER, 41 – previous wife of the deceased minister, who died from influenza in 1950.

FANNIE MAE ELDER, 15 – died in 1951 from pneumonia.

ANNIE PEARL ELDER, 9 – died in 1951 from pneumonia.


At a coroner's jury hearing. Mrs. Elder denied knowing what arsenic looked like, but admitted taking insurance policies on most of the deceased a few months prior to their demise with herself as beneficiary. The policies ranged from $50 up to $3,000.

It was further revealed that two living daughters of the poisoned Hunter Hills Baptist Church pastor have been treated for poisoning this year at a local hospital.

The woman was arrested by order of a Fulton County coroner’s jury and the case was being investigated by Detectives L. T. Bullard and J. E. Helms.

The Rev. Mr. Elder became  bedridden at his home after he took sick on a construction project where he was working as a carpenter’s helper. Mrs. Elder said she thought he became ill from eating bananas and cheese while at work.

[William Fowlkes, “Quiz Woman in 13 ‘Poison’ Deaths’ – ‘Poison’ Deaths Probed,” Courier (Pittsburgh, Pa.), Sep. 27, 1952, p. 1]

***

FULL TEXT (Article 3 of 7): Atlanta – Roberta Elder faces life imprisonment for the poison murder of her husband, the Rev. William M. Elder.

Police said 14 members the 45-year-old Negro's family have died under mysterious circumstances in 14 years. She still is to be tried on murder charges brought forthe poison deaths of two step-children.

A Superior Court jury yesterday convicted her of murdering her husband but recommended mercy and made a life sentence mandatory. Witnesses testified that the woman, treasurer of the religious organization, was short in her accounts and had a $500 insurance policy on her husband at the time of his death.

[“Roberta Elder Faces Life Imprisonment For Husband's Death,” syndicated (AP), Thomasville Times-Enterprise (Ga.), Oct. 2, 1953, p. 7]

***

FULL TEXT (Article 4 of 7): Atlanta, Ga. – When Atlanta’s Rev. William M. Elder died in 1952, after reportedly “eating bananas and cheese,” his family physician refused to sign the death certificate.

The doctor noticed that the skin of the middle-aged Baptist minister had “shifted” and that there were sores in ruddy spots of the man’s emaciated body.

Oddly enough, he recalled that he had signed a death certificate the year before for This is the first of a aeries of four articles by the Courier’s William A. Fowlkes. Elder’s daughter, Fannie Mae, the cause of death having been listed as pneumonia. He admitted he “might have been in error.” And the year previously Dr. had signed a certificate for Annie Pearl Elder, another daughter, the cause of death also having been listed as pneumonia.

The medic associated the similarity in symptoms of pneumonia and arsenic poisoning.

He then notified the coroner that there should be a postmortem examination, and suggested that an investigation be launched at the Eason Street, N. W home of the Rev. Mr. Elder and his careful-talking, almost emotionless wife, Roberta.

Tests showed that enough grains of arsenic were in the Rev. Mr. Elder’s body to kill three men two and seven-tenth grains.

Atlanta detectives called into the case – principally Detective J. E. Helms – carefully compiled a list of persons who had died since, 1938 while living in the households of Roberta Elder in her native Watkinsville, Ga., and in Atlanta’s Northeast and Northwest sections.

They found thirteen possible victims, from two weeks old to 93 years of age. Most of them had died of pneumonia, uremic and or “food poisoning.” Most of them were insured with policies worth from $30 to $500. Most of them died a year or slightly more after being insured.

When Detective Helms presented his findings to the hastily assembled coroner’s jury, listing the possible victims and the sequence of their deaths in Mrs.. Elder’s dwelling places, Fulton County Coroner Ed Almond declared:

“This is an unheard of thing . . . Why, this reads like something out of a story book . . !”

Indeed, it was!

The jury ordered Mrs. Elder held for murder . . subsequent court orders resulted in the bodies of two of the Rev. Mr. Elder’s young children being exhumed from the lonely “garden of death” Mrs. Elder had “planted.” They found the tell-tale evidence in their young bodies – arsenic!

Although the state only tried Mrs. Elder on one of the three murder indictments, Fulton County Grand Jury returned against her, and was able only to get life imprisonment for the accused, she will probably never get out of prison.

The other two murder accusations are waiting against her should she and some lawyer decide the time is ripe to appeal for parole after serving seven years in a Georgia prison. Mrs. Elder never confessed a thing, although the state pointed as strong an accusing finger toward her as has been pointed toward a murderer.

Circumstantial evidence in a Georgia murder may be appealed away from any electric chair conviction and does not stand up in higher courts.

Atlanta police claim Mrs. Elder, whom they continually referred to as “Mrs. Bluebeard,” outdid the original namesake and all his tribe in both the Old and New Worlds!

[“Atlanta’s ‘Mrs. Bluebeard’ – The Strange Case of Roberta Elder!” Courier (Pittsburgh, Pa.), Aug. 29, 1954, p. 5]

***

FULL TEXT (Article 5 of 7): Roberta Elder “was cool as a cucumber” when Atlanta police told her she would have to attend an inquest seeking the cause of death of her husband, the Rev. William M. Elder, a Baptist minister and week-day carpenter. She way just as “cool” when the state finally got a life-term sentence against her nearly two years later. With as much indifference as a cornered opossum, Mrs. Elder merely shrugged her shoulders when deputies escorted her from the courtroom.

She never confessed anything!

She was “positive” that she did not place - any of the “pink stuff”“ used to sprinkle and kill insects on flowers into a bottle ofmilk of magnesia, contents of which allegedly were given her “sick” husband.

The Rev. Mr. Elder became ill on his construction job. He started vomiting and sweating. His stomach was real sick. When asked what Was wrong, he told his foreman he had eaten “bananas and cheese.”

Later, as the Rev. Mr. Elder lay on his deathbed, his body wasted away, fellow - workman Henry Smith said he commented:

“Well, I didn’t know bananas and cheese would hurt you.” “I didn’t know it myself!” the Rev. Mr. Elder replied, never knowing what was sapping his life blood away. All the while, Mrs. Elder testified in coroner’s hearings and in an unsworn statement

Mrs. Roberta Elder entering at her trial that she was “caring for” her sick man.

Family physician Dr. --------- testified that Mrs. Elder called him to the home when the minister first became ill. The sick man was given medicine and Mrs. Elder was told to call the doctor if the Rev. Mr. Elder failed to show improvement and cure. The doctor later told the court that he was not called again until the Rev. Mr. Elder was dying. It was then that he noticed the preacher’s skin had slipped and there were peculiar skin discolorations and sores on his body.

The doctor refused to sign the death certificate and called in the county coroner, the circumstances proving to be deaths suspicious.

When the bodies of Annie Pearl Elder and Fannie Mae Elder were exhumed later, a coroner’s physician and licensed criminologist reported 1.20 milligrams of pure arsenic were found in the hair and the skin tissues. Their death certificates showed “pneumonia” listed as the cause of their deaths.

Mrs. Elder is still under indictment for murder in the Annie Pearl-Fannie Mae Elder deaths.

The state, which listed thirteen possible victims of Atlanta’s “Mrs. Bluebeard,” holds these accusations over her head in the announced aim of keeping Mrs. Elder behind bars for the rest of her natural life.

[William. A. Fowlkes, “Atlanta’s ‘Mrs. Bluebeard’ – The Strange Case of Roberta Elder – Matron Goes to Prison – Georgia,” Courier (Pittsburgh, Pa.), Sep. 4, 1954, p. 7]

***

FULL TEXT (Article 6 of 7): Atlanta police were never able to find a record where Mrs. Roberta Elder actually purchased arsenic which Fulton County grand jurors accused her of using to kill her husband and two step-daughters for their insurance money.

Witnesses told coroner’s and grand jurors that sacks of the “pink powder” would turn up at the Atlanta Eason Street home of the Elders after Mrs. Elder took trips .to a brother’s farm near Watkinsville. The powdered poison was “to kill plant insects,” survivors said they, were told.

Police could not produce a witness who saw Mrs. Elder place arsenic in a milk of magnesia bottle, the contents of which were invariably given the sick who came under Mrs. Elder’s care.”

The Rev. Mr. Elder’s surviving children – William Jr., Dorothy and Viola – whose lives also were covered with policies with Mrs. Elder as beneficiary, “knew” the bottle and its effect. Their two sisters – Fannie Mae and Annie Pearl – died from arsenic poisoning, the state determined.

Dorothy told a coroner’s jury she was ill once after Mrs. Elder gave her some “milk of magnesia.” Viola said she vomited and was ill after her step-mother gave her “some medicine.”

Police claimed the following persons died under “suspicious” circumstances while living in a household with Mrs. Elder since 1938.

John Woodard, 36, 519 Bedford Place, N. E., alleged common-law husband of Mrs. Elder. Died in December, 1938.

James W. Thurmond, 13, 519 Bedford Place, a son of Mrs. Elder by her first marriage. Died In June, 1939.

Jimmy Lee Crane Hunter, 2, 1221 Eason Street, a grandson of Mrs. Elder. Died Dec. 16, 1941.

Gloria Evans, 3, 1221 Eason Street, N. W., died Dec. 26, 1944. (Cause of death: acute gastro empiritis [sic].)

James Garfield Crane, 1. Died December, 1943.

Willie Mae Elder, stepdaughter of Mrs. Elder, 279 Chappell Road, N. W. Died January, 1950.

Fannie Mae Elder, 1221 Eason Street, N. W., stepdaughter of Mrs. Elder. Died March, 1951. (Cause of death originally listed as pneumonia and uremic poisoning.)

Collie Brown, mother of Mrs. Elder. Died in 1945.

Willie Mae Thurmond,” 2 weeks old, daughter of Mrs. Elder by a previous marriage, who died in Watkinsville, Ga.

Lillie Lou Thurmond, 1 week old, daughter of Mrs. Elder by a previous marriage, who died in the rear of a Morris Street, N. E., Atlanta, address.

Nora Scott Harris, 93. Died December, 1951.

The Rev. William H. Elder, husband of Mrs. Elder. Died in August, 1952.

[William A Fowlkes, “The Strange Case of Roberta Elder (Part 3) – Atlanta’s ‘Mrs. Bluebeard,’” Courier (Pittsburgh, Pa.), Sep. 11, 1954, p. 7]

***


FULL TEXT (Article 7 of 7): Roberta Elder, whose insurance arsenic murder case shocked Atlanta and the nation, admitted to Atlanta officials she had two husbands and friends.

One of these friends John Woodward died in 1938 under mysterious circumstances in the Grady Hospital, according to Mrs. Elder’s admission.

Incidentally, Mrs. Elder testified that she had a $125 policy on him when he died. She collected it, she said.

The husbands she alleged were the Rev. William M. Elder, whose arsenic murder led to her life-term sentence, and Garfield Crane, reportedly still living in Atlanta. Police say she had only one legal husband.

The insurance money which the state claimed was the motive in most of the foul play deaths, came for the most part, in amounts from $50 to $225.

A larger policy was held on the Rev. Mr. Elder, the benefits of which the insurance company refused to pay because of the nature of death.

Depositions taken by police from officials of an Atlanta fraternal organization, some of which were testified to in court, revealed that Mrs. Elder had misplaced a fairly large sum of money as treasurer.

Irregularities were first noted in the bank account of the group when a check bounced. There was no satisfaction of this item by Mrs. Elder at first, even though, newly elected leaders insisted that she meet them at the bank with the bank book.

Mrs. Elder always forgot the bank book, they said.

At one inquest Mrs. Elder testified that she had one $500 policy on the Rev. Mr. Elder which was taken out in 1951, the year before he died.

The policies on Fannie Mae Elder, of which Mrs. Elder was chief beneficiary, totaled $550, police reported.

When asked if she had given the Rev. Mr. Elder’s daughter, Annie Pearl, proper care, Mrs. Elder told a coroner’s jury: At all times.

Asked three times if she had ever bought any kind of poison, including arsenic, the accused Mrs. Bluebeard replied:

“No. I wouldn’t know what it looks like!”

Of the minister’s worsened condition following the doctor’s visit, Mrs. Elder admitted he had a “set-back” after he ate “some cheese and eggs” cooked at home. His first alleged attack came from eating “bananas and cheese” bought away from home and eaten on his construction job, she said.

Atlanta police held Mrs. Elder in jail over nine months before her case was presented to the grand jury, and over fifteen months before the case finally went to trial.

Mrs. Elder was from the hubbies and really living on Easy Street policies she held on deceased friends for compiling the convincing circumstantial evidence.

It was believed that the accused would break down and confess under the strain of waiting and watching the web of circumstantial evidence being wound about her.

However, Roberta Elder has never admitted poisoning any of the thirteen possible victims of arsenic who died while living under her household roof. The state, which can’t electrocute her under the circumstantial evidence code, says she won’t ever get out of prison for these revolting crimes.

[W. A. Fowlkes, “The Strange Case of Roberta Elder (Part 4) – Atlanta’s ‘Mrs. Bluebeard,’” Courier (Pittsburgh, Pa.), Sep. 18, 1954, p. 7]

***


The suspected victims of Roberta Elder include 3 husbands (including “Common law husband”), 4 of her children, 3 step-children, her mother, her grandchild, a cousin, and the former wife of a husband.

Husbands – Rev. William H. Elder (died Aug. 21, 1952); John Woodward (36, common law h, died 1938); James Garfield Crane (45, died 1947)

Children (her own) – Willie May Thurmond (2-weeks-old); Lizzie May Thurmond (1-week-old); James Garfield Crane (1, died Dec. 1943); James W. Thurmond (13,  Jun. 1939)

Step-children – Willie Thurmond (12, died 1939); Fannie Mae Elder (15, died Mar. 1951); Annie Pearl Elder (9, died 1951);

Mother – Mrs. Kelly “Collie” Brown (died 1945)

Cousin – Gloria Evans (died Dec. 26, 1944)

Grandchild –Jimmy Lee Crane Hunter (2, died 1943)

Former wife of husband – Mrs. Willie Mae Elder (41, died Jan. 1950)

Friend – Nora Scott Harris (93 or 94, died Dec. 22, 1951)

***

Photo "Homicide Detective..." from: [“13 Dead, Call Woman ‘Bluebeard’ – Admits Insuring All Dead Kinsmen,” Chicago Defender (Il.), Sep. 27, 1952, p. 1]

***

 

For links to other cases of woman who murdered 2 or more husbands (or paramours), see Black Widow Serial Killers.

***

http://unknownmisandry.blogspot.com/2012/11/female-serial-killers-of-africa-african.html


***

The World's First Men's Rights Organization (with a comprehensive men's issues agenda) - 1926-1938, Vienna

$
0
0

NOTE: There is a great deal of information from German language sources that is to be added to this post. Most important to note is the error made by English language sources regarding the name Liga für Menschenrechte: it is incorrect. That name belonged to an organization -- founded in the same city in the same year --  for “human rights” (not involved with the conflict between the sexes, but rather advocating international peace)  rather than “men’s rights” group. The correct name is Der Bund für Männerrechte, founded in Vienna in March 1926 by Sigurd Höberth von Schwarzthal (born 1880, Odessa; died August 1938) and Leopold Kornblüh. Activities of the founders extended at least to the year 1935. There was not just one, but several publications published by the two men following the schism. 

The word “Männerrechtler”is roughly the equivalent of “men’s rights activist,” and has been found in publications in the late 1800s and the decades preceding the 1926 founding of Der Bund für Männerrechte.

The world’s first men’s rights organization? Technically this is nit accurate. An organization formed in 1898 in the United States (Atlanta, Georgia) has been identified It’s inspiration and continued focus was to resist a proposed “bachelor’s tax." Its ethos, of bachelorhood, closely resembles today’s “Men Going Their Own Way” movement (MGTOW). Yet Der Bund deserves credit as the first organization known to be established with a comprehensive program designed to address the full range of men’s issues. The founding of Der Bund für Männerrechte is, however, the first men’s rights organization with a comprehensive mandate, addressing a wide range of men’s issues rather than having its focus on a single one (such as alimony or a particular piece of legislation). The ambition and comprehensiveness is attested to by the fact that Der Bund issued a ten-point “covenant” on  March 2, 1926, stating its aims and covering a wide range of  “men’s issues.”

The organization broke into two factions in January 1927. The cause was Hoebert’s founding in December 1926  of an additional organization which he conceived as complementary to the aims of Der Bund. It was called Themisverband [Themis from Greek mythology – Themis is said to have preceded Apollo in giving oracular responses at Delphi. She was the daughter of Cœlus and Terra, and was the first to instruct men to ask of the Gods that which was lawful and right, whence she took the name of Themis, which signifies in Greek, ‘that which is just and right.’] The aim of this second association was “to fight all injustice, irrespective of whether it was committed against men or women.” The consequence of this decision to associate himself with women's issues was the resignation ofKornblüh, who in January 1927 formed Justitia Verein für Männer und Familienrecht, which was restricted to male membership. His view was that the aims of Der Bund and an organization that addressed the concerns of both sexes was irreconcilable. The Bund having collapsed, Höberth regrouped by forming a new organization, Aequitas Weltbund für Männerrechte, which would be open to both sexes.

Leopold Kornblüh (48, Jewish bachelor), along with a German railway official, Karl Knierling (36) and a Federal Railways pensioner, Alfred Porzer (52, Catholic, divorced) formed the association "Justice Federation for Family law reform." The group set up "Divorce counseling center" one in which men every Monday between 8 pm and 10 pm (20:00 and 22:00), which took place at their headquarters at Gumpendorferstraße 6, in Vienna’s 6th District.

[more to be added]

***

FULL TEXT (Article 1 of 9): Berlin, May 27—A revolt of the down-trodden male against the domineering female is, on the way in Vienna where the “Rights for Men” League has been founded to start the battle.

The League, which held its first big mass meeting recently, is composed so far only of bachelors, divorced husbands, and unmarried fathers. The still married husbands, the members insist, would like to join, but their wives won’t let them, which in itself is cited as proof for the need of such an organisation.

The mass meeting was held under the slogan of “equal rights for men.”

Sigurd Hoeberth, the president of the League, denied emphatically that the aggressive males were women haters. All the League wanted, he said, was that the preferences and privileges which the women now receive from society, from the State, and especially from the courts, should stop.

“We love and honour the ladies,” Hoeberth said, “but we want to leave to our descendants once more real mothers and wives, and to prevent their being killed off by the alleged emancipation of the woman.”

Numerous speakers denounced the “degenerate literary cafe clique” for having placed woman on such a high pedestal “that she has come to consider it as her right not only to claim but also to abuse her privileges arid her freedom.”

“The feminist, hysterical and degenerate cafe scribblers have helped cunning woman to forge intolerable chains for men,” explained one of the speakers, Wollner.

“The man is roped before the family coach, and on the driving seat sits the ‘gracious lady,’ and if he doesn’t pull till he drops, she swings the whip of legal paragraphs over him.”

A large part of the prison inmates, Wollner said, have been put there by the accusationsof their own wives. A good number of the initiates of insane asylums, he charged, have been put there by their wives because they were in the way.

“The reason for all this,” Wollner said, “is that the authorities believe the women everything and the man nothing, although they should know that the he is a specific attribute of the feminine sex.”

The principal complaint of the league members was against the alimony claims of divorced wives and the claims of support of unmarried mothers.

The secretary of the League, Hofeneder, pictured the claims for alimony and support as a cruel persecution of the men, inspired not only by greed but often also by revenge and plain “cussedness.”

Under the present Austrian law, Hofeneder said, the unmarried mother has practically her choiceto whom she wants to pick as the father of her child. And he deplored that a Vienna court had rejected the blood test for paternity on the ground that this test was not yet sufficiently developed.

“The unmarried father is helpless against the cunning and the revenge of the unmarried mother,” Hofeneder said. “Our antiquated laws speak only of the duties of the unmarried fathers, not of their rights.

[“Men Form Defence League In Vienna.” The Daily Gleaner (Kingston, Jamaica), Jun. 10, 1926, p. 19; The spelling in the original, "Hoeberth," is erroneous.]

***


FULL TEXT (Article 2 of 9): Vienna, Feb. 17.—With the slogan "We men must hang together." The Vienna League for the Rights of Men, organized for protection against the encroachment of women have discussed the rescue of Charlie Chaplin at a sympathy meeting.

Herr Knobloch [error in orig./ correct: Kornblueh (Leopold Kornblüh)], a member of the executive committee of the league, declared:

"This is another case where a woman's treachery andwoman's falsity are trying to ruin a good man."

He characterized the Chaplin-Gray marriage as a "speculation marriage entered into by American gold diggers."

It was resolved to send Chaplin their sympathy.

A resolution was also passed against Mussolini’s attempt to suppress bachelors* which it was charged again violates the rights of men in favor of women.

[“Anti-Woman Club Formed,” Syndicated (Universal Service), San Antonio Light (Tx.), Feb. 17, 1927, p. 4-A]

* This refers to what is known as “The Battle for Births.” – The Battle for Births began in 1927: Mussolini introduced a number of measures to encourage reproduction, with an objective of increasing the population from 40 million to 60 million by 1950. Loans were offered to married couples, with part of the loan cancelled for each new child, and any married man who had more than six children was made exempt from taxation. Mussolini, who had developed a cult of personality, argued that the Italian people had a duty to their leader (“Il Duce”) to produce as many children as possible. In correspondence with these incentives, laws were brought in to penalize any citizens who proved to be less productive. Bachelors were taxed increasingly, and by the late 1930s, the civil service began recruiting and promoting only those who were fertile and married. [Wikipedia]

***


NOTE: The “men only” offshoot of Bund für Männerrechte, Vienna, led by Leopold Kornblueh, is discussed here.

FULL TEXT (Article 3 of 9): VIENNA, May 25.—Charlie Chaplin will deliver a lecture on the tyranny of women in America in Vienna this summer.

This announcement made by Herr Kornblueh at the recent congress of the Vienna league of men called “Justitia” was greeted with tremendous applause.

“Charlie Chaplin is one of our most ardent supporters abroad” Herr Kornblueh declared, “and since his divorce, he has written to us assuring our organization of his sympathy and emphasizing the necessity of a world wide movement for the emancipation of the oppressed husbands.

“The tyranny of modern women, who demand all rights and refuse all duties, who are marrying men only to lead a careless, workless and childless life, or to obtain a divorce and a lifelong alimony, this shameful tyranny is the underlying cause of all evils.

“Look at the insane asylum Steinhof in Vienna. Fifty percent of the unfortunate inmates were brought to this place because of their marriage.’’

The congress passed a resolution demanding the abolishment of alimonies find other unequal pacts between the two sexes, and protesting against the favoritism of the authorities in favor of women, especially the siding of the police with the wives whenever a domestic quarrel develops.

The Justitia is the first organization in the world fighting for the “emancipation of men,” and makes its appeal to all those “in revolt against the oppression of the female sex.” Only the freedom of men can prevent the white race from decline and ruin, declares one of the organizations proclamations.

“The only trouble is,” confessed Kornblueh, “there are few courageous men. Husbands are too cowardly, while bachelors are perhaps too willing to join our organization.”

[“Chaplin, Siding With Fellows, Will Assail Tyranny of Women - American Comedian and Victim of ‘Oppression of Female Sex’ Joins Brothers of ‘Justitia’ in Fight For ‘Emancipation of Men’,” The Charleston Gazette (W. Va.), May 27, 1928, p. 6]


***

FULL TEXT (Article 4 of 9): Vienna, Austria. – Dr. Sigurd Hoeberth has courage. He has called a conference of all men of the world for Sept. 25 to discuss ways and means of obtaining equal rights for men. Dr. Hoeberth is also an optimist, for he thinks at least 2,000 men will dare to show up at such a conference, in Hofburg Hall in Emperor Franz Joseph palace. It is large and beautiful hall, with the distinct; advantage of having many exits. In case women storm the palace the men would have a chance to away and establish alibis.

For a time Dr. Hoeberth disappeared from Mozart strasse. It thought by those who did not know him he had given up the right for man’s rights, just the contrary. Undaunted he is waging the battle in the heart of Vienna's financial district. His new office is on the main floor of one of Vienna's many defunct banks. Where once the Viennese went long on their own securities, to their sorrow, and sold French francs short, also to their sorrow, Dr. Hoeberth is now barricaded, behind a show window, blazing with his posters. Within his office he is further protected by a high counter. It is perhaps superfluous to add his office has an exit on the back street.

The show window of the World League for Men's Rights attracts considerable attention. The posters are gay, and contain a sufficient outline of what Dr. Hoeberth is boosting. Pretty stenographers, on the way to and from lunch, occupy the sidewalk next to the window, and picket Dr. Hoeberth's shop. They open their umbrellas, and hold them at an angle to prevent the men from reading. Sometimes the police are compelled to keep the crowd moving. Now and then a man pulls his hat down, and turns up his collar, before running the gauntlet to get inside and ask for literature on the subject of men's rights. The market women grunt with disdain when they pass.

Surprisingly, Dr. Hoeberth is finding a number of Viennese women who agree with him.  They say unscrupulous women have scared men so it is hard for a really modest and refined woman to catch a husband. "If the present laws are maintained," they relate, "it will be necessary to use bear traps." Moved by pity, or some other emotion, even Mrs. Ross, wife of Prof. Edward Alsworth Ross of the University of Wisconsin, said Dr. Hoeberth has some good ideas.


Dr. Hoeberth has 10 points which he is demanding for men before he will accept an armistice. They are:

1. Divorced women, able to earn their own living, or those who have an income of their own, are not entitled to alimony,

2. Alimony claims are valid only for marriages which last three years. The amount of alimony is to be based on the duration of the marriage.

3. After the termination of a marriage the woman, loses the right to use the name of the husband.

4. The legal limit in Austria for contesting the legitimate birth of a child, now three months, is to be abolished. The procedure shall be the same as in contested paternity.

5. Blood tests and anthropological examination have to be considered as a judicial and legal method for determining paternity.

6. Mothers are to be required to support illegitimate children according to their means.

7. The father of an illegitimate child shall not only have obligations towards the child, but also is entitled to rights as to the child.

8. Illegitimate children are required to support aged and invalid parents.

9. The existence minimum cannot be derogated because of failure to pay alimony or contribute to support. The law by which a man can be thrown into prison for failure to pay alimony must be repealed.

10. "Further," says Dr. Hoeberth, "we are fighting all the monstrosities which have come from the emancipation of woman."

The league cites the case of Johann Apfelmuss, but of course this is not the right name of this poor man. Mr. Apfelmuss was in the hospital about to undergo an operation when his wife asked the judge for a divorce. The date hearing was set on the very day when Mr. Aphelmuss was to be operated upon. Mr. Apfelmus asked for a postponement but his request passed unnoticed. Mrs. Apfelmuss received an uncontested decree. Her husband became legally culpable.

Contrary to what the doctors predicted, Mr. Apfelmuss recovered, after along siege, and two years later got a job at the Vienna average, $30 per month. Five dollars of this was subtracted at the source for sickness insurance, pension fund and the usual social undertakings for which the Viennese worker must contribute whether he wishes or not. For his room and breakfast Mr. Apfelmuss paid $9. Then as Mr. Apfelmuss did not contest the divorce the judge ordered him to pay his wife $13 per month. This left Mr. Apfelmuss with the large sum of almost $4. The funny part of this story is that the former Mrs. Apfelmuss is a post office girl, and receives the union wage scale.

Dr. Hoeberth knows a number of these stories and when the league meets Sept. 25 in the Hofburg hall, he will relate all the harrowing details. That is, he will if the stenographer and market women have not climbed over the barricade into his office before that time.

[A. R. Drucker, “Equal Rights For Mere Man League’s Aim - World Convention Plans to Curtail Alleged Women's Advantages Austrian Takes Lead Thinks 2,000 Men Will Show Up to Protest Their Wrongs,” Syracuse Herald (N.Y.), Jun. 23, 1929, Sec. 3, p. 4]


FULL TEXT (Article 5 of 9): Vienna, Austria. — “Aequitas.” By this slogan a number of Viennese men hope to start a movement by which man, mere man, can cope with woman. Of course the battle is lost before started, and these poor misguided males might better should the white flag, and yield while the yielding is good. The chances are all against them. A conservative bettor would not even risk Austrian inflated currency of the period when ten thousand kronen made one dollar. But their feeble attempts are worth nothing even if the only result achieved is to dissuade other men from making the same futile endeavors.

Herr Hoeberth, Viennese lawyer had something to do with domestic relations cases in Austria. The tragedy of wronged husbands and exploited innocent bachelors worked on his feelings that after due meditation he decided to take action. He formed the beginnings of the world league for men’s rights the “Aequitas.” In the otherwise harmonious street named Mozart Gasse he opened an office on the round floor back of a court.

~ Nothing Feminine Allowed ~ 

Except a coldly cynical janitress nothing female was allowed in the office, beyond now and then a pretty steno. A statute of justice holding sword and scales does not count, being made of plaster, and not able to talk back. No fire and a generally absence-of-female look pervaded the room. The curtains hung awry, and the chairs were all placed wrong enough to delight any care-free bachelor. By keeping your over coat on, and swinging your hands now and then you could keep from freezing.

But Herr Hoeberth warmed up to his subject. “We demand equal rights,” he said. “The shameful condition as regards marriage and family rights has in many countries become a public scandal and disgrace. The cause is to be found in antiquated laws, and in the way justice administered so as to be downright inimical to males. For two years our organization has been fighting to change this, and often we have been slandered. Our intention is not to attack marriage nor to lessen rights for women. Our aim is to guide the lawmakers so as to place family life on asound and just basis. We wish to have laws adjusted to modern conditions, with equal duties and also equal rights for both sexes.

~ Laws Out of Date Now ~

“One hundred years ago, when our present laws were enacted, it will probably be necessary to protect women, as they were shut out of most economic pursuits, and had no political rights. In those days the woman remained home until married. She occupied herself with her parent’s household, and brought with her, when married, a moral consciousness and a sense of the value of marriage. The old-fashioned woman rarely demanded divorce. and usually when she did so, she had good and sufficient reasons. And as she could not very well go into business she was justified in demanding and receiving alimony.

“Now all this is changed. The “woman of today enjoys all the political and economic rights of man. Every occupation is open to her. Indeed in many cases she can advance more rapidly than a man. Under these conditions what does marriage mean for a woman who has not a moral consciousness? To her marriage is nothing more than a nose bag. And according to our laws a husband is just an animal required to keep the nose bag full. And if a man is not ready to go over the top in order to keep his nose bag full enough to satisfy the speculative ambitions of his wife, then prison stares him in the face.

~ Just a Nose Bag Filler~

“And how do the instruments of justice act? A smirking smile, a well cut dress, a few crocodile tears, and the nose bag filler is lost. A woman cannot lose in court. We have collected data showing in detail many cases where justice has been flouted. Under such conditions it is suicide for a man to marry. And this explains the falling off in marriage, and the many liaisons. What can one expect? But even in the liaisons man is the victim. The father of the illegitimate child is always the one who can fill the nose bag to the fullest, and satisfy the woman’s ambitions. Our laws require that there be a father. It is left to the unscrupulous woman to choose one. This practice has ruined the lives of many innocent men. It is high time we got together and insisted upon equal rights.”

“Right, you are.” we said to Herr Hoeberth. but not very enthusiastically. We had a hunch. Later we went back to the harmonious office in Mozart Gasse. Herr Hoeberth had moved. “Where?” we asked the cynical janitress.

“Don’t know.”

“And his mail. Isn’t it forwarded?

“He doesn’t get any mail.”

But we think Herr Hoeberth is still fighting against fate. He received a number of inquiries, and requests to be admitted to the organization. Also the judges finally admitted his paternity blood test. It is possible at least, so it is claimed, to tell who was not the father.

[“Equality Is Asked By Austrian Male - “Aequitas,” Viennese Society Champions Husbands and Bachelors,” (from Chicago Daily News), The Charleston Daily Mail (W. Va.), May 3, 1929, p. 17]

***


FULL TEXT (Article 6 of 9): Vienna, Aug. 14.— Two leagues are functioning in Vienna today to “obtain equal rights for oppressed males,” but one of them is not striving so valiantly as it used to. The founder fell in love and decided to allow women themselves to join.

These two organizations are “Aequitas,” the original organization, which has invited “honest” women to participate in its world conference here next month, and “Justitia,” which is against all women.

When Herr Von Hoeberth, a divorced man of Vienna, formed the original league for the rights of men. He was outspoken in his criticism of laws and usages which gave men and especially married or divorced men “the worst of it.” He had little use for women and feminine prerogatives and did not hesitate to say so. But when he fell in love everything was changed.

~ Founder Is Firm ~

Herr Kornblueh one of the founders of the original league, who remained firm in his anti-woman attitude, declared in an address to his colleagues:

“Tread softly, my dear comrades, upon this floor because you are treading on one of my dreams. Herr Von Hoeberth, our president, who was known as an honorable divorced man, became entangled in a love affair, is seen in public places with a young woman, whom foolish youth would call a charming one, and has recently opened the doors of our league to women. This, I regard, as a desecration of our sublime ideals.”

This was the first serious discord among the fighters for the “emancipation of men.” It led to the secession of one faction from the original league and the creation of “Justitia.”

Herr Von Hoeberth remained president of “Aequitas” while Herr Hornblueh was chosen president of the hundred per centers of “Justitia.”

The world conference in Vienna sponsored by “Aequitas” is scheduled to open on September 25. Its program, as previously outlined by Herr Von Hoeberth calls for inauguration of an international movement for reform of marriage and divorce laws, especially laws relating to alimony. It is claimed that “unprincipled women purposely marry men with the idea of obtaining divorces and alimony later on.”

“Justitia” is opposed to the present movement to bestow still further political liberties upon women, who, it is claimed, are “forgetting their natural duties.”

[Alfred Tyrnauer, “Oppressed Males To Have Their Inning - Two Leagues Functioning In Vienna To Obtain Equal Rights For Oppressed Males Allowing Women To Join League Becomes Controversial Point With Founders,” syndicated (INS), New Castle News, Pa,), Aug. 14, 1929, p. 15]

***

~ • ~ • ~ Link: A discussion of this organization in relation to activities in the United States, 1929

~ • ~ • ~ Link: A woman's view of this organization, 1929

~ • ~ • ~ Link: Interest in this organization in France, 1930

***

http://unknownmisandry.blogspot.com/2014/02/british-branch-of-international-mens.html



***


FULL TEXT (Article 7 of 9): Vienna. – Equitas, the world league for the rights of men, an organization which had its headquarters here and a membership made up of Europeans and Americans, has disappeared. Whether it has gone to the ground before the victorious advance of all conquering woman or merely as part of the world economic depression is not clear. At all events, it has given up its offices.

The two handsome plateglass windows, which once displayed a patchwork of such newspaper clippings as “Singer Shoots Her Husband,” “First Feminine Broker Revealed as Swindler,” “Orgies of 18-Year-Old Girl,” “Husband Poisoners of Nagrev,” and “Film Star’s Wife Wants Million Alimony,” are now filled with the exhibits of a shoe store, and a women’s shoe store at that.

A year ago Sigurd Hoeberth, president of the world league, sent hundreds of invitations to college professors, bankers and journalists of the United States to attend the world congress at which the league’s objectives were to be discussed. So few recipients took the initiative seriously, however, that the congress was postponed.

From then on the league’s interests and activities steadily declined until practically the only source of funds was its feminine members. Of these the league had, according to a statement of the president, 500, and he admitted in confidence that they were the best contributors, more especially mothers with marriageable sons.

[“World League for Rights of Men Dies; Women’s Shoe Store in Headquarters,” syndicated, The Tipton Daily Tribune (In.), Oct. 7, 1930, p. 1]

***

EXCERPT (Article 8 of 9; from article similar to the previous one): With the League has gone its weekly journal, “Self-Defense,” that contained such interesting features as a serial entitles “Satan’s Daughter,” and a sort of market report on the state of men’s rights in various parts of the world, but it perished apparently for want of department store advertising, leaving to women the last word as usual.

[“League for Men’s Rights Abandoned – ‘Equitas’ Had Headquarters in Vienna – Europeans and Americans Among Members,” The Gazette (Montreal), Oct. 6, 1930, p. 13]

***


FULL TEXT (Article 9 of 9): Rarely does a mother consider a son’s choice of a wife worthy of the distinction conferred upon her.

Equitas, the world league for the rights of men, with headquarters in Vienna, was made up largely of women members, a majority of them mothers of marriageable sons. The purpose of Equitas was to defend men against the encroachment of women, whom it charged with being in league to pre-empt all world power and dominion.

Equitas’ offices bristled with such potent warnings as “Singer Shoots Her Husband, “Husband Poisoners of Nagyrev,” “Orgies of an 18-year-Old Girl.” A weekly journal, “Self Defense,” kept members and public informed on status of men’s rights in various parts of the world. Now Equitas has folded to make way for a woman’s shoe store in the quarters it occupied.

Mothers find their sons do not share their apprehension concerning the dangers besetting the path of an eligible young man. Equitas could furnish its members no recipe for convincing a young man in love that the object of his affection is a designing creature plotting to reduce him to a state of dependence or even slavery. Unlikely as it seems, the time may come when men will be compelled to band together in defense of their rights, as women were forced to unite in a concerted drive against man domination, and Equitas may rise again.

[“Mothers’ Club to Save Sons Closes Doors,” syndicated (Newspaper Alliance), The Milwaukee Journal (Wi.), Oct. 10, 1930, p. 10]

***

These English language reports were incorrect in assuming that closing of the offices of Aequitas and Justitia meant that the organizations had disbanded. Justitia remained active until 1937. Aequitas remained active until Hoeberth's death in 1938. Soon after the founder died the Nazi Anschluss Commissioner shut down the organization.

***

NOTE on naming error in English language sources:

English language sources never, insofar as currently available sources reveal, gave the correct name of Der Bund für Männerrechte. By mistake they replaced the correct name with Liga für Menschenrechte, another, unrelated Viennese organization.

Coincidentally in 1926 another organization with an almost identical name was founded in Austria, Österreichische Liga für Menschenrechte. This Austrian organization, founded by  Rudolf Goldscheid (1870-1931) was associated with Fédération internationale des droits de l'Homme of ligues. Its mission was the promotion of human rights in general, not on problems of the relations between the sexes. There is no connection between Goldsheid and Hoeberth’s organizations despite the similarity of name, location and date of origin.

***

***

***

The “Early Men’s Rights Activism” post gives links to other articles on 1910s-1930s men’s rights activism in several countries. ◄•◄

SEE ALSO: Early Men's Rights Activists: 1926-1960

***


For more revelations of this suppressed history, see The Alimony Racket: Checklist of Posts

***

The Unknown History of MISANDRY - GREATEST HITS

$
0
0

If you read nothing but the few selected posts linked below you will have achieved a better understanding of the cultural situation we are in today than is possessed by 99.99% of the population. Misandry is not only a problem of the relation of the sexes that has been further compounded by chivalry (male enablers), and the topped-off with a layer of professional predators. Nowadays, unlike in the past the entire culture has been redesigned to reflect a misandric mindset. Cultural Misandry has increased the powerlessness of a general population. Men and women both are increasingly threatened by an ever more powerful elite, which, with its mercenary army of social engineering drones seeks to lord over every aspect of our lives and to control the bodies and minds of our children.

We have all been lied to about history. At this point we absolutely must become informed about the background of the injustices of misandry and understand past efforts to overcome them in order for us to properly address the present -- and for us to intelligently plan a better future. Without knowing our own history we are wandering in the dark: isolated, confused, continually reinventing the wheel. The following reading selection could be easily seen as the text-book for a “crash course on the history of Anti-Misandry.”

►►►The Basic “Must-Read” List◄◄◄

1)  The First Men’s Rights Organization – 1926-1930 Self-recommending; should be read by every MRA, without exception.

2)  A Woman’s Voice  collection of quotations dating from 1904 to 1953 by prominent women who spoke out publicly against misandry.

3)  “A Monopoly on their Children” – Misandric Parenting in 1939A female writer exposes how women with personality disorders deliberately undermine the father-child relationship.

4) The Alimony Racket: Quotations A quick way to learn about half a century of anti-misandry struggle.

5) Chivalry Justice Quotations How women gained their “license to kill.” Don’t blame the female sex; the chivalric male is just as big a problem as the predatory female.

6) Chicago Murderesses Express Their Preference for All-Male Juries: Much Easier to Manipulate – 1912 This is the “mother of all Chivalry Justice articles.”

7) Chivalry Justice in 1921: Anti-Misandry Female Judges How honest women sought to bring predatory females to justice.

8) The Long-Flourishing Heart-Balm Racket: A Men’s Rights Activist Tells Its History – 1935 An incentive to make false accusations – an earlier incarnation of present-day scams.

9) Society’s Acceptance of Domestic Violence?The great lie that preceding the rise of the domestic violence industry the crime of (genuine) domestic violence was ignored and/or found acceptable by the “patriarchy” is finally exposed as a hoax.

10) Victimizing Veterans: The Alimony Racket in 1920 Doesn’t get more cynical than this.

11) Women Who Prey Upon Servicemen – 1950 30 years later: more of the same.

12) Maternal Filicide: Spousal Revenge Motive The worst kind of domestic violence (which the experts pretend is not committed with malice by predatory women).

13) How Wives Gained Power By Mass-Murder of Husbands A misandric utopia?

14) The Cross-Dressing Husband-Killing Syndicate Maven: Viktoria Rieger A misandric vigilante at work.

15) Fathers’ Rights Pickets and Protests: 1930-1991 A photo-essay on Fathers’ Rights activism.

16) Early Men’s Rights Activism1910s-1930s, international.

17) Samuel Reid: The First Fathers’ Rights Activist– 1925 Bold actions, bold statements.

18) Early Men’s Rights Writings by C. M. Castellazzo – 1927Strategic thoughts on MR activism and its challenges.

19) The Creepiest Female Serial Killer QuotationsBecause women are characterized, we are told, by “inherent non-violence.”

20) What is Misandric Fixation?Genocidal & separatist feminism of the Valerie Solanas variety, and other varieties of obsessive misandry have been around a long time.

21) Domestic Violence: Non-Lethal Female-on-Male►Just the facts (you are not supposed to know).

►►►The Advanced “Must-Read” List◄◄◄

1) The Origins of Divorce Court CorruptionA dirty secret exposed: law professors refuse to tell their students about this article.

2) “A Word for Men’s Rights” - 1856Self-recommending.

3) Three Early Parental Kidnapping Cases, 1792-1815: Peirson, Bonnell, Tuthell History not taught in the universities.

4) “Why Men Don’t Marry” – MGTOW (Men Going Their Own Way)in 1919The case is iconic for its encapsulation of so many of the issues of the men’s rights movement: chivalry, female sentencing discount, female privilege, a woman’s “right to kill,” the misuse of psychology in legal defense, predatory use of alimony law, the abuse of the courts for revenge purposes, attention whoring, and infantilizing of women (neglecting to hold them accountable because of their sex).

Much of the material in GREATEST HITS is discussed, and put into context, in the following article, written by the editor of UHoM , and published at A Voice for Men: “Setting the Record Straight”

Judith Neelley, Sadistic Pervert Serial Killer - 1982

$
0
0


EXCERPT: Active from 1980 to 1982, Alvin Neelley and his wife, Judith, liked to refer to themselves as the Night Rider and Lady Sundance. This murderous couple who delighted in the association of their heinous exploits with those of Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid, killed at least fifteen women [based on Alvin’s confession] in a reign of terror that ranged across three southern states. [Michael D. Kelleher & C. L. Kelleher, Murder Most Rare: The Female Serial Killer, Praeger Books, 1998, p. 135]

***

EXCERPT: Judith adapted the standard “politically correct” defense [its the man’s fault] only after reflection and thus created a new narrative adding stories of domestic violence.  As Davis notes, “Asked if she was afraid of her husband Alvin, she shook her head and said that he was the only person she’d ever trusted. She would later change this story to suggest that he’d abused her almost every day of her life – though the endless beatings mysteriously left not a single bruise.  … Prior to her trial, Judith had never alleged that Alvin had abused her – but now she followed Jo Ann to the stand and gave a defence that amounted  to Battered Wife Syndrome, even though she didn’t fit the true definition of a battered wife. [Carol Ann Davis, Women Who Kill: Profiles of Female Serial killers, 2001, Allison & Busby Ltd, p. 100-01]

Yet, the following type of inaccurate, yet politically correct, claim – fitting the dogma of ideological “gender theory” continue to be put forth: “Judith Neelley, a battered woman and the youngest American woman to serve time on death row, was convicted of committing the heinous murders of two women at the behest of her abusive husband.”

***


Wikipedia: Alvin Howard Neelley, Jr. (1953–2005) and Judith Ann Adams Neelley (born 1964) are an American couple responsible for two torture murders. They each were convicted of the kidnappings and murders of Lisa Ann Millican and Janice Chatman. Judy Neelley was sentenced to death by the state of Alabama in 1983, but her sentence was later commuted to life imprisonment in 1999. She is serving her sentence at the Julia Tutwiler Prison for Women in Wetumpka, Alabama. Alvin Neelley was serving a life sentence at the Bostick State Prison in Hardwick, Georgia at the time of his death in 2005.

~ Early lives ~ ~

~ Alvin Neelley ~

Alvin Howard Neelley, Jr. was born in Georgia in 1953, where he was a car thief during his teenage years. He met his second wife Judith Ann Adams when he was 26 years old and she was 15. Alvin divorced his first wife shortly before eloping in 1980.

~ Judith Ann Neelley ~

Judith Ann Adams was born in Murfreesboro, Tennessee in June 1964. Her father, an alcoholic, died in a motorcycle accident when she was nine. After meeting Alvin Neelley, she began her life of crime, committing armed robbery across the country (even when heavily pregnant) for which she was later caught. She gave birth to twins while incarcerated at Rome’s Youth Development Center.

~ Youth Development Center crimes ~

On September 11, 1982, a Youth Development Center employee, Ken Dooley’s home was shot at four times. The following day, fellow employee Linda Adair’s home was firebombed with a Molotov cocktail. Phone calls were made to the victims following the attacks by a female who claimed to have been sexually abused at the Youth Development Center, but neither victim could identify the caller’s voice.

~ Lisa Ann Millican ~

Lisa Ann Millican, a 13 year-old girl from Cedartown, Georgia was abducted by Alvin and Judith Neelley from the Riverbend Mall in Rome, Georgia on September 25, 1982. She was taken to a Murfreesboro, Tennessee (Scottsboro, Al.) motel where the Neelleys held her captive. During her captivity, Lisa was raped by both Neelleys, and Judith injected her with Drano. On the 28th, Lisa was shot in the head by Judith and her body was thrown in the Little River Canyon in Fort Payne, Alabama. Judith even called police to report Lisa’s body.

“The couple held her prisoner for three days, repeatedly molesting her in seedy motel rooms while their own children looked on. Finally tiring of the game, Judith tried injecting their victim with liquid drain cleaner, but she kept hitting muscle instead of a vein, reducing Lisa’s flesh to what a coroner would call “the consistency of anchovy paste. Still Lisa lived, in agony, and she was driven to Alabama’s Little River Canyon, finished off with bullets after more injections failed to do the job. [Bad Girls Do It!,

~ Janice Chatman and John Hancock ~

Janice Chatman and John Hancock were a young engaged couple from Rome, Georgia. On October 4, 1982, they were abducted by Judith Neelley. John Hancock was shot while Janice Chatman was abducted and brought back to the Neelleys’ motel room, where she was tortured and murdered. John Hancock, however, did not die, and was able to point to Alvin and Judith Neelley as his assailants.

~ Arrests and trial ~

Judith Neelley was arrested on October 9, 1982, and Alvin was taken into custody a few days later. Judith was deduced as being the perpetrator in the YDC employee attacks.

To avoid the death penalty, Alvin Neelley pled guilty to murder and aggravated assault in Georgia. He was not tried for the Lisa Millican murder. Judith Neelley’s trial began on March 7, 1983, in Fort Payne, Al. Before her trial however, she gave birth to a third child behind bars. After a six-week trial, Judith was convicted of the torture murder of Lisa Ann Millican. Despite a jury‘s recommendation to sentence Judith to life in prison, judge Randall Cole sentenced the 18 year-old mother of three to death in Alabama‘s electric chair.

Following her first conviction, Judith pled guilty to Janice Chatman’s murder.

~ Aftermath ~

Alvin Neelley was incarcerated at the Bostick State Prison from 1983 until his death in November 2005.

Judith Neelley became the youngest woman sentenced to death in the United States. She was on Alabama’s Death Row at the Julia Tutwiler Prison for Women.

Judith appealed for a new trial, but it was denied in March 1987. In 1989, the United States Supreme Court affirmed her death sentence. On January 15, 1999, Judith Neelley was days from her execution date when Alabama’s then-governor Fob James granted her clemency, commuting her death sentence to life in prison. The decision was met with controversy, but James cited how Judith’s jury wanted to sentence her to life in prison, but the judge sentenced her to death. Judith will be eligible for parole in January 2014.

~ In the media ~

On February 28, 2008, the Neelleys’ case was profiled on the Investigation Discovery program Most Evil. On a scale developed by forensic psychiatrist Michael Stone, Judith was ranked as a category 22 killer, the “most evil” level deemed for serial torture murderers.

On October 23, 2008, Alvin and Judith Neelley were featured on another Investigation Discovery program, Wicked Attraction, in the episode “Hearts of Darkness.”

Judith, presented as the mastermind of the murder spree, was featured on a third Investigation Discovery program, Deadly Women, in the July 2011 episode “Twisted Thrills.”

***

Alvin’s attest and statements following October 14, 1982 arrest –

“Police got a break on October 14, when the Neelleys were arrested for check in Judith’s hometown of Murfreesboro. Alvin initially denied raping Lisa Millican, but he finally caved in. Even so, he contended, the crimes had been Judith’s idea. She enjoyed rough sex with women, he said, but the real turn-on was power – in this case, the literal power – in this case, the literal power of life and death. Neelley fingered his wife for a minimum of eight murders, perhaps as many as fifteen, committed in her role as “enforcer” for an elusive white-slave ring. More to the point, he sketched and signed a map of rural Cattooga County, Georgia, where police found Janice Chatman’s decomposing corpse.” [Michael Newton, Bad Girl’s Do It! 1983, Loompanics Unlimited, p. 128]

***

Chronology:
Oct. 1980 – Judith armed robbery, mugging of female victim
Summer 1981 – Judith arrested for theft
Sep. 11, 1982 – Youth Development Center employee, Ken Dooley’s home was shot at four times.
Sep. 11, 1982 – fellow employee Linda Adair’s home was firebombed with a Molotov cocktail.
Sep. 25, 1982 – kidnapping of Lisa Ann Millican, 13
Sep. 28, 1982 – murder Lisa Ann Millican
Oct. 1982 – Murfreesboro woman raped
Oct. 3 (4?), 1982 – murder Janice Chatman, shooting of John Hancock
Oct. 9, 1982 – Judith Arrested
Oct. 14, 1982 – Alvin, check fraud arrest
Mar. 7, 1983 trial begins in Fort Payne, Al., for torture murder of Lisa Ann Millican
1983 – Conviction Following her first conviction, Judith pled guilty to Janice Chatman's murder.
April 18, 1983 – sentenced to death
Jan. 15, 1999– death sentence was commuted to life in prison by Gov. Fob James That was just a few days after the U.S. Supreme Court had rejected an appeal by Neelley.
April 18, 2014 (?) – files lawsuit

Victims:

Lisa Millican, 13 – 4 days couple raped; Judith murdered Sep. 25, 1982
Janice Chatman – murdered, Oct. 3, 1982
John Hancock – wounded, shot in backOct. 3, 1982
Unnamed victims – Alvin’s confession claimed a total of  8 to 15 women murdered [Michael Newton, 1993]
Oct. 1982 – Murfreesboro woman raped [M. Newton, 1993]

***

Mattie Shann, Suspected New Jersey Serial Killer - 1893

$
0
0

FULL TEXT (Article 1 of 5): Trenton, N. J., Aug. 8. – The trial of Mrs. Mattie C. Shann, charged with the murder of her husband and her son, John F. Shann, aged 20, began to-day. It is alleged that Mrs. Shann poisoned her victims with a solution of bichloride of mercury, that she at the life of her daughter in the same manner, and that she burned three houses in Princeton. The motive for her arts was the recovery of insurance money.  Her son was sick six weeks. During that time, it is charged, the apparently faithful and sleepless nurse watched by his side, administering a solution of bichloride of mercury in such doses that it slowly but surely destroyed his life.

When young Shann died the insurance company became suspicious and decided to make an examination. Mrs. Shann of the matter and the next morning told a wonderful story. She said that during the night three masked men, claiming to come from the insurance company, forced their way to the room where her son's body lay. There they cut open the body and extracted therefrom the entire stomach, lungs, and heart. A coroner’s jury was hurriedly impaneled and a portion of the kidney and other parts of the stomach, which the alleged ghouls in their haste had failed to take, were secured and submitted to Professor Wormley, of the University Pennsylvania, for analysis. At the inquest the professor testified that in the part submitted to him he found more than enough bichloride of mercury to cause death and he judged the entire stomach must have been similarly affected by the poison.

[“Murder For Money Charged – Mrs. Shann on Trial At Trenton, N. J., For Killing Her Husband and Her Son.”  The Daily Inter Ocean (Chicago, Il.), Aug. 9, 1893, p. 9]

***


FULL TEXT (Article 2 of 5): Trenton, N. J., Aug. 9. -- The trial of Mrs. Mattie C. Shann, indicted for murdering by poison her 20-year-old son, John F. Shann, at their home in Princeton on April 18 last, has just begun here. The peculiar and horrible nature of the accusation against the woman – the doing to death by slow torture of her own child to recover $2,100 insurance on his life – lends dread fascination to the trial, and the expected throng of spectators was early on hand.

Several of the front rows of seats in the old county court house were filled with women, among whom were half a score of Mrs. Shann’s Princeton neighbors. Her appearance in the court room was the signal for a renewal among them of all the old talk about the suspicious death of Frederick Shann, the prisoner’s husband, last November, and the peculiar and mysterious illness of her daughter-in-law, Mrs. Hattie Shann, five years ago. As the story goes, Mrs. Hattie Shann was in confinement and drank some of the contents of a bowl of lemonade, in the bottom of which were discovered traces of paris green. The poison had settled in the bottom of the bowl, and she had not imbibed enough to do her much harm.

The prisoner, Mrs. Shann, was brought into court at 11 o’clock. She is a tall, slender woman with a face indicating considerable refinement. She was dressed in deepest mourning, a long crepe veil, kid gloves, a black fan and a black bordered handkerchief being conspicuous features of her attire. She gave no sign of suffering in consequence of her three months of imprisonment in the county jail.

She was accompanied to court by Mr. and Mrs. James Kelly of Philadelphia, the latter her daughter, and by Mrs. Harriett B. Gray, of Princeton, who is a sister.

Near the prisoner sat her four lawyers, viz: Ex-Senator Geo. O. Vanderbilt, of Princeton and W. D. Holt, Chauncey H. Beasley and Francis H. Lee, of Trenton. The State was represented by prosecutor Bayard Stockton, and assistant prosecutor W. Holt Apgar.

The drawing of the jury was, as usual, a tedious process.

Judge Abbett, who presided, made it plain at the outset that the reading of newspaper accounts of the crime was not to be a ground of challenge, and the jurors were asked, after admitting that they had read the newspaper reports of the crime, what opinion, if any, they had formed touching the innocence or guilt of the accused. One man declared that he was not given to newspaper reading at all. and he was peremptorily challenged. Several who swore that they had conscientious scruples against the infliction of capital punishment were speedily excused from service.

One proposed juror was declared incompetent to serve because he took morphine twice a week to deaden the pains of rheumatism. Another was excused upon acknowledging membership in the East Trenton Athletic Association.

The defense sent him off but did not make the reason for its action known. An intelligent looking man about 60 years of age, living in the heart of Trenton, declared he had never heard of the Shann case. His Declaration seemed to amuse the lawyers, for they all smiled, but he was not challenged and therefore got a seat in the box.

Hugh Shann, a son of the prisoner, and Mabel Shann, a daughter, who was at home when her brother died and was disemboweled, came into court at noon and took seats near their mother.

When the entire panel of jurors summoned for the term had been examined the twelfth man was secured and the jury for Mrs. Shann’s trial was complete.

Of the 12 men chosen to decide her fate six are farmers and two salesmen. The foreman is a barber. A grocer, a blacksmith and a retired merchant constitute the remainder of the list. Prosecutor Stockton opened the case of the State rehearsing all details of the tragedy.

[“Mrs. Shann On Trial - The Sensational Murder Case Begun at Trenton. - Tedious Work Getting A Jury  - A One Man Challenged Because He Belonged to an Athletic Club -- The Prisoner in Deep Mourning Attire -- Horrible Nature of the Charge Against Her.” The Evening Democrat (Warren, Pa.), Aug. 9, 1893, p. 3]

***

FULL TEXT (Article 3 of 5): In the trial of Mrs. Mattie C. Shann for her life, at Trenton, on the charge of poisoning her son John, Dr. Bergen concluded his evidence as given in the Tomes yesterday.

William B. Beity, of No. 1710 Smith street, Philadelphia, and Samuel Asfell testified that they boarded with Mrs. Shann about the time John Shann died. They were not certain they heard any noise the night the body was mutilated.

Howard M. Goff said he was an inspector of risks for the Manhattan Life Insurance company. He was sent to Princeton in April last to investigate the Shann case. He asked Mrs. Shann if he could see John. Mrs. Shann told him he couldn’t. He then saw Dr. Bergen who told him about the young man’s illness. He spent the night in Trenton and in the morning went to New York and reported to his company, after which he sent his telegram to Dr. Bergen about the autopsy.

“Did you order anybody to do anything with the body of John Shann?”

“No.”

This question was objected to and finally waived.

Mr. Goff told of a visit he made to the Shann house the day after the mutilation. He was accompanied by the coroner and the county physician. The body was examined and the stomach was found to be empty.

Frank Borden, the insurance agent who secured the policies on John Shann’s life, identified them. After John’s death be reported the fact to his companies the same day. He first heard of the proposed autopsy from Dr. Bergen about 9 o’clock the Wednesday night after Shann’s death. He went home and sent a note to Mrs. Shann asked him to see her mother. He went the Shann told him of the alleged visit of three strange men and the mutilation of the body.

Mrs. Frank C. Borden, wife of the insurance agent, testified that her husband told her of the proposed autopsy, and she read the note sent to Mrs. Shann. Right after the delivery of the note Mrs. Shann sent word that she wanted to see Mrs. Borden. He did not care to go and Mrs. Borden went. “I told Mrs. Shann why the note was sent,” said the witness, “and said the autopsy would be held in the morning, and my husband thought she ought to have her lawyer present.”

Frank C. Borden, son of Agent Borden, testified to delivering his father a note to Mrs. Shann.

Eliza Blaine testified that she stopped at the Shann house the Wednesday night after John’s death. She didn’t hear the bell ring in the night, but she heard footsteps in the hall about midnight.

At this point judge Abett adjourned the court.


[“The Shann Case. – The Testimony Continued Yesterday Afternoon.” The Daily Times (New Brunswick, N. J.), Aug. 10, 1893, p. 1]

***

FULL TEXT (Article 4 of 5): The taking of testimony in the case of Mrs. Mattie Shann, who is on trial for the murder of her son John, was completed at noon today and at the afternoon session of court Assistant Prosecutor Apgar presented his closing argument on the part of the State. He will be followed to-morrow by Messrs. Holt and Beasley for the defense and by Prosecutor Stockton on the part of the State. Two hours each have been allotted counsel for their closing arguments, and it is probable that the charge of the Judge will be delivered on Saturday morning, after which the case will be left in the hands of the jury.

The defense is undoubtedly worse off to-day that it was yesterday, as Mabel Shann, the youngest daughter of the defendant, made several contradictory statements on the witness stand, and the State brought out numerous points in rebuttal, which went a good ways towards clearing up the doubtful points of the case.

MABEL SHANN’S TESTIMONY.

In her testimony before the Coroner’s jury, taken by deposition, as she was sick at the time, Mabel said that she never gave John any medicine, but that her mother always attended to that. To-day she stated that she had given John pills regularly during his sickness which only she and himself knew anything about. She testified that she had gotten them from the drug store herself and that he had taken one every two hours, being especially regular during the last two weeks of his sickness.

On cross-examination she said that she had the box refilled about three times a week and that the prescription called for six pills. When asked to tell how she could give thirty-six or forty pills per week when she bought but eighteen she got pretty badly mixed up and said sometimes they were not given regularly and there was an interval of four hours. The pills in question are supposed to have been compound catharitic.

JOHN SHANN’S DISEASE.

A number of witnesses were placed on the stand to prove that John Shann had no blood disease during the winter of 1892-83, and while it was brought out that John had visited houses of ill-fame in the city of Trenton it was shown that he had not contracted any disease of a serious nature.

Several people testified to being in the vicinity of the Shann house on the night of the disembowelment or to passing it between the hours of 1 and 3 o’clock, and none of them had seen or heard any men or carriage there. It was also proved that the three men seen by Night Watchman Whorley were not, as it was previously supposed, the ones who visited the Shann house, but three reputable citizens of the borough.

Mrs. Kelly, recalled, said that she had made a mistake in saying John took three tablespoons of ginger and two tablespoons of red pepper, and that it was in reality two-thirds of a tablespoonful of pepper he took.

DR. WOLFF SCORED.

Mr. Apgar, who is especially strong In ridicule, scored some of the witnesses severely, among them being the expert of the defense Dr. Wolff, of Connecticut who, he said, had come high because the defense had to have him, and would not have been wanted but for his ability to swear best for the side that paid him the most. The case, he said, was one of purely circumstantial evidence, and he likened it to the recent celebrated case of Carlyle Harris in that the mother had preserved some of the medicines given her son in order to prove that others given were not poisonous.

He dwelt at considerable length on the made, is considered to be somewhat indefinite.
testimony of Professors Wormley and Corwall and said that they were men, who would not come before a jury and give testimony calculated to take a human life unless they knew it to be true.

AN ARRAIGNMENT OF MRS. SHANN.

He ridiculed Mrs. Shann’s actions on the night of the disembowelment. There was some motive, said Mr. Apgar, for the removal of the vitals from John Shann’s body and that motive could only have existed in the breast of one who knew that something was wrong, that some crime would be divulged should the vitals be examined. There were but six persons in all the world who knew that an autopsy was to be held when Frank Borden sent word to Mrs. Shann. Within four hours the vitals were gone. It Is Denied, However,

Mrs. Shann refused admittance to Mr. Gough when no one was sleeping in the room with the corpse, but had no uneasiness when three ghouls entered the house in the silent hours of the night and forced their way to the room where her disrobed daughter lay. Mr. Apgar declared that the story was preposterous.

He said that three men disembowling a corpse would never have been careful enough to leave so few marks of their work upon the clothing of the corpse. They would not have been so careful of the property of Mrs. Shann. Mr. Apgar said that no human mother would have acted as Mrs. Shann declares she did. No mother would have refrained from looking at the mutilated body of her dead boy, no mother would nave called a boarder to look at the corpse and would never in the world have sat there till morning without raising an alarm or without trying to capture the fiends who had desecrated the body.

BELIEVES MRS. SHANN GUILTY.

Again no mother would have been so regardless of her daughter’s virtue as to go first to the room of Vanselous without stopping to see whether her daughter’s virtue and purity were still untouched, and no mother would have been satisfied with the explanation of Vanselous that “something has been done” when she saw the blood spots on the body of her son.

In closing Mr. Apgar said that in light of the circumstances he could safely trust the case in the hands of the jury. He believed Mrs. Shann guilty and conscientiously asked the jury to convict her.

During the argument of Mr. Apgar Mrs. Shann seemed to be in deep anguish, and rested her head on the lap of her daughter, Mrs. Kelly.

[“The Testimony All In - Closing Argument In The Sham Trial To Be Made To-Day. - Evidence Of Mabel Sham – The Prisoner’s Youngest Daughter is Placed on the Stand, But Her Testimony Does Not Prove Very Favorable for the Defense – Mrs. Shann Severely Arraigned by Assistant Prosecutor Apgar.” The Times (Philadelphia, Pa.), Aug. 18, 1893, p. 2]

***

FULL TEXT (Article 5 of 5): Trenton, N. J., Aug. 21. “We find the defendant not guilty.” These words were uttered by Foreman Dopper, of the Shann jury, at 9:30 this morning, and Mattie C. Shann, who has been on trial for the murder of her son for two weeks, was set free.

The court room was packed as never be fore, but not the slightest demonstration took place. The court had enjoined silence only a moment before. Mrs. Shann sat surrounded by the members of her family, her body swaying gently back and forth.

When the verdict was announced she suddenly threw her head up and then fell upon her knees and her lips were seen to move as if in prayer. Her daughters Mabel and Mrs. Kelly threw their arms around her and kissed her and the scene was most affecting.

The formalities attending the discharge of Mrs. Shann from custody were brief and quickly over. She expressed a desire to thank the jurors, and Captain Hall arose and spoke to Judge Abbett. The latter shook his head negatively and it was surmised that he objected to any demonstration.

When Mrs. Shann passed out of court it was to go again to her quarters in the county jail that she might prepare for her departure from the building and from the city. The great crowd pressed close to the bar enclosure and peered into her face, and a few shook bands with her in the grand jury room, and she shook hands with and thanked them.

It is said the jury decided to acquit after a few ballots taken on Sunday. The trial of the case has cost the county $10,000.

[“Mrs. Shann Acquitted. - The Jury Return a Verdict of Not Guilty - A Dramatic Scene.” Reading Times (Pa.), Aug. 22, 1893, p. 1]

***
Suspected Victims:

John F. Shann, 20, died Apr. 18, 1893
Frederick Shann, husband, died Nov. 1892
Mrs. Hattie Shann, daughter-in-law, 1888, survived

Aug. 9, 1893 – trial begins
Aug. 21, 1893 – acquitted

***


***

http://unknownmisandry.blogspot.com/2012/02/female-serial-killers-of-19th-century.html


For more cases of this category, see: Female Serial Killers of 19th Century America (as of January 20, 2014, the collection contains 61 cases)

***

Mattie Troy, 300-pound African-American Serial Killer - 1910

$
0
0

FULL TEXT (Article 1 of 3): As a result of the beginning of a coroner's inquest yesterday morning the body of a negro boy, who is said to have died here mysteriously two months ago, was exhumed last night and an effort will be made to identity it today as that of Harry Marshall of Kansas City, Mo. At the time the boy died a woman, who claimed to be his stepmother, held here under a charge of illegally collecting life insurance, asserted his name was Willard D. Troy. After the insurance had been collected agents for the Metropolitan Life Insurance company, in which the real Willard Troy was insured, discovered the living boy and swore to a complaint charging obtaining money under false pretenses.

Since the beginning of the inquiry it is believed the boy was murdered and that the woman, Mattie Troy alias Mary Troy alias Mary Troy Thomas, who claimed to have been his stepmother, is the murderess. The inquiry has developed several other things that may prove the woman to be a second Mrs. Gunness of Laporte, Ind., fame. It was asserted yesterday, during the course of the hearing, that another child, Jessie Watson, died while insured in the favor of the Troy woman in a manner strongly suggesting arsenical poisoning and that the woman’s husband died last summer, also mysteriously and also insured. The little girl is said to have died at 612 Holmes street, Kansas City, April 24, 1909, after a short illness. A Dr. Uthank, who attended her, told Walter Fearn, an agent for the Metropolitan Life Insurance company, so the latter testified, that there were all the symptoms of arsenical poisoning in the death and that he had notified the Kansas city authorities, but a delay made it too late to hold a post mortem and the matter was dropped.

The husband is said to have died last July. Willard Troy, or rather Harry Marshall, as the boy is believed to have been, died in Topeka November 6, 1909, and was buried by Stone street & Hamilton the following day. In addition to the three deaths mentioned in particular, it was asserted that there have been others, perhaps half a dozen more, and in each case the victim has carried insurance, making a chain of suspicious circumstances that the officers believe may mean that the woman is a wholesale murderess.

Mattie Troy was arrested at the home of her husband, an Argentine ragman, at 230 Maple  street, Argentine, Wednesday night, and was brought here Thursday morning. Upon being taken to the county jail she began praying at the top of her voice, asking the Lord to have mercy on her for what she had done. An investigation of her belongings showed that she had quite a stock of arsenic in her trunk, corroborating the strong suspicion that it was arsenical poisoning that caused the deaths.

The Troy woman came to Topeka, so Mrs. Robert Washam testified, October 28 and stopped at the Washam hotel, 116 East Seventh avenue. The night she arrived two children she had with her, a boy and a girl, both were in good spirits. The next day, however, the boy took sick and remained so until November when he died. A picture purporting to be that of the dead boy was identified yesterday by Eva Baker, an aunt of Harry Marshall, who has been missing since he was persuaded to accompany the Troy woman, as her nephew, and it was identified by Undertaker Hamilton as that of the body he buried November 7.


Alter having secured ample evidence to warrant exhuming the dead body of the boy County Attorney Schenck called a halt and suggested that the next step would be to exhume the body, have it identified if possible, and then proceed with a post mortem and an analysis of the contents of the stomach to determine whether or not there are traces of poison. This was ordered done, the jury being adjourned until 10 o'clock this morning, when it will meet Dr. H. H. Keith, county coroner, at the Stone street & Hamilton undertaking parlors to view the exhumed remains. At that time also the aunt of Harry Marshall will be present to identify the body if, as is expected, it is that of Harry Marshall.

[“Negro Woman May Be Wholesale Murderess – Witnesses Testify Two Died of Arsenical Poisoning. – Body of Boy Buried Here Exhumed for Post Mortem Today – Analysis to Find Trace of Poison Ordered.” The Topeka Daily Capital (Ka.), Jan. 8, 1910, p. 5]

***

FULL TEXT (Article 2 of 3): Mattie Troy, alias Mary Thomas, charged with obtaining money under false pretenses in that she collected insurance on the life of a boy who was not dead, and charged also with murder in the first degree in connection with the death of David Marshall, here November 6, waived preliminary hearing In both cases before Judge Ernest R. Simon in the court of Topeka yesterday and was bound over to the district court in the sum of $500 and $7,000 in the two cases respectively.

It was asserted late yesterday afternoon that arrangements probably will be made to try the woman some time during the present term of the district court in which case, in case she is convicted as the officers feel sure she will be, she will be taken to Lansing with other convicts later in the term.

Mattie Troy, alias Mary Thomas, wife of an Argentine, Kan., rag man, is alleged to have given David Marshall, whom she “borrowed” in Kansas City for the purpose, arsenic here to kill him. After his death she claimed insurance for David Troy, her step-son, swearing that the dead boy was David Troy. The finding of the living David Troy aroused the suspicions of the Metropolitan Life Insurance company’s agents, in which the boy was insured, and shortly afterward a complaint was sworn to charging the woman with obtaining money under false pretenses in that she collected insurance on the life of a boy who was not dead, The question of the identity of the boy who did die soon was cleared up and a chemical analysis of the boy’s stomach showed traces of arsenic, strengthening the belief that the Marshall boy was murdered.

[“Mattie Troy To Face  A Charge Of Murder.” The Topeka Daily Capital (Ka.), Jan. 29, 1910, p. 6]

***

FULL TEXT (Article 3 of 3): Mattie Troy, alias Mary Thomas, wanted for the  murder in the first degree in connection with the death of a child here shells alleged to have murdered in order to collect insurance carried on his life, escaped from the state hospital yesterday morning about 7 o’clock, an although she was hunted high and low all day yesterday, scarcely any trace of her could be found. The woman acted unbalanced at the county jail where she was waiting for trial, and finally was taken before a commission in lunacy. In the local probate court and was adjudged insane, At the time of her commitment to the state hospital it was asserted that she was failing so fast in jail it was feared she would not live a week. Since being at the hospital, however, Dr. T. C. Biddle reports that she has been gaining both physically and mentally, and almost has regained her normal weight of about 300 pounds.

Just how she escaped is something of a mystery. She was confined in a cottage on the grounds. Dr. Biddle says, and she was there all right early yesterday morning. After breakfast she was missed, and a search revealed her departure. Later a street car conductor on the asylum line told the hunters that he had taken a woman to town, a colored woman who was large and heavy, and she answered the description well enough that it is deemed probable she was Mattie Troy.

The woman was arrested nearly a year ago charged with the murder of a boy here in Topeka. An investigation following the death of the child on the part of adjusters for the Metropolitan Life Insurance company, in which the boy’s life was insured, showed that the boy who was dead was not the one on whom insurance was carried. The body of the boy who died immediately was ordered exhumed, and a chemical analysis showed arsenic in good sized quantities in vital organs. The woman is alleged to nave poisoned several other persons. In- eluding at least alleged murder here.

Dr. Biddle believes that his patient will be recovered in a day or two at most, declaring that he is going to keep after her until he gets her. He believes she is in the city, and therefore within reach.

[“Mattie Troy Escapes From State Hospital - Was Charged With Murder Of Boy Nearly A Year Ago But Was Found Insane -  Believed She Came to City on Street Car and That She Is In Hiding Somewhere In Topeka.” The Topeka Daily Capital (Ka.), Jan. 3, 1911, p. 6]

***

Deaths:

Apr. 24, 1909 – Jessie Watson, girl, died
Jul. 1909 – Husband died, “mysteriously”
Nov. 6, 1909, Harry Marshall, 10, died. He had been kidnapped (“borrowed”), substituted for Willard Troy

“In addition to the three deaths mentioned in particular, it was asserted that there have been others, perhaps half a dozen more.”


Frona McMahon’s Hobby Was Marrying & Murdering Men – North Carolina, 1915

$
0
0

FULL TEXT: Mrs. Frona McMahon, only 34 years old, has begun her sentence of three years for killing her husband, Dave McMahon, in Haywood county last August. She has had six matrimonial experience, three of her husbands dying under suspicious circumstances, three of her husbands dying under suspicious circumstances, and three abandoned her.

[Untitled, The State Journal (Raleigh, N. C.), Feb. 25, 1916, p. 6]

***

FULL TEXT: Durham, N. C., March 3. – Mrs. Frona McMahon of Haywood county went once too often to the altar. As a result of the death of her sixth spouse she started a three-year term in the state penitentiary for manslaughter, pleading guilty after a jury failed to agree in a fifty-three-hour session.

Mrs. McMahon is 34. she was first married when 16. the first died suddenly, the second eloped, the third  died suddenly, the fourth and fifth eloped and the sixth, Dave McMahon, she shot.

[“Admits Killing Husband – Woman Goes to Prison After Disposing of Her Sixt Spouse,” Fitchburg Daily Sentinel (Ma.), Mar. 3, 1916, p. 8]

***

 

For links to other cases of woman who murdered 2 or more husbands (or paramours), see Black Widow Serial Killers.

***

Murder-Coaching Moms

$
0
0

Following are 25 cases in which mothers coaxed or ordered their own children to commit murder.

***


1740 – Elizabeth Branch– Taunton, Somerset, England

Elizabeth Branch and her daughter Mary were executed for the murder of a 13-year-old servant girl. They had tortured this and other victims in their employ mercilessly. One boy was tortured until he soiled himself and was then forced to eat his own excrement. It was suspected that Mrs. Branch has murdered her husband and her own mother and another servant girl.

***




While her husband was eating, Roxalana Druse “stole up behind him and shot him. The daughter Mary, who had been provided with a rope noose, then appeared upon the scene, threw the cord about him and dragged him to the floor. Mrs. Druse then called Frank Grates back into the house. Handing the boy the pistol, she said it would not go off, and ordered him to shoot her husband or himself be shot. The deed commanded seemed more desirable to the youngster than its alternative, and he commenced the work with trembling alacrity. But before he had emptied all the chambers of the revolver the infuriated female tore the pistol from his hand and finished the horrid task herself. Then with an ax she cut off the dying man's head, dismembered the body and chopped it small enough to burn and boil, the boys gathering shingles to make right hot fires in both stoves. All this with the assistance of her daughter Mary and in the presence of her little son George. Then she fell into the errors that finally led to her detection. The fragments of the body were thrown into the boiler and two red-hot stoves.”

***



Sexually tortured and murdered 3 orphan girls. Her son’s participation was not clear, but he was at least a passive participant.

***


1897 – Nancy Staffleback– Galena, Kansas – Leader of a murderous clan guilty of at least 6 murders; 2 sons convicted along with their mother.
“George and Ed Staffleback have been found guilty of murder in the first degree and sentenced to the penitentiary for life, while the mother, hoary in crime as in years – she is now 65 – has been found guilty of murder in the second degree and will no doubt end her years in prison, having received a twenty-five-year sentence.”

***


1901 – Mrs. Stallion – Aurora, Missouri

Mrs. John Stallion and two sons by a former marriage murdered Alice Stallion, her step daughter, aged sixteen. The boys held Alice while her mother broke her skull with a poker. The body was then thrown in the James river.

***

 

At the instigation of his mother, Baroness De Courvigny, who was a drunk, Robert De Courvigny murdered his father. The wife had failed in poisoning her victim but the son succeeded in the task by means of a bullet.

***

Mother and 17-year old daughter; leaders of a large gang; daughter lured victims to the Tamarin home where they were robbed and murdered and cannibalized. 27 corpses were found.

***

1913 – Yates / Farris case – Troy, Tennessee

Mrs. Hennie Yates, thirty-six, and daughter, Floy Farris, fifteen, charged with the murder of Ligon Yates, twelve, and Ida May Yates, ten. They were the step-children of Hennie and the half-siblings of Floy. Children drowned in creek near home at Troy, Tenn.  Mrs. Yates will give no other reason for committing the crime than: “They made my life miserable.” The woman is apparently rational, realizes the enormity of her crime, but does not in any way show that she is remorseful. . The little girl cowered in a separate cell as far away from her mother asshe could get. She declares she is afraid of her mother and assisted in the murder only after she had been threatened with death by her parent if she refused.

***


1919 – Broderick / Woodlock case –  St. Louis, Missouri

Ursula Broderick claimed she killed her father, Thomas P. Broderick, when she was 12. She was acquitted of murder by a jury who had believed her testimony that she had been protecting her mother from being beaten, and when 16, murdered her step-father, Joseph F. Woodlock, whom she falsely claimed has attempted to rape her. She was found guilty after three trials. Testimony revealed that Ursula had attempted to bribe a witness to perjure herself by repeating in court the false rape accusation story. After Ursula’s conviction, Mrs. Woodlock was charged with the murder of her both husbands, the state contending that Ursua had lied to protect her mother.

***



Ray Clough, 14, shot his father, James A. Clough, to death after his mother gave him the gun and instructed him to do the deed, falsely claiming the boy’s two younger brothers had just been murdered by the father.

***



Elizabeth Potegian, an Armenian immigrant living in central California, was accused of murdering her husband, two stepchildren. Mrs. Potegian under arrest, accused her mother, Mrs. Maria Torosian. When the police went to arrest the woman they found her body dangling from a rafter in her home. She had hanged herself. On the same day Mrs. Potegian tried to kill herself in her jail cell, slashing her wrists. During the investigation it was learned that while living in Armenia, Mrs. Torosian had been married six times, each husband meeting his death under mysterious circumstances. Mrs. Potegian was tried for the murder of her step-daughter, with her surviving son, Gordon, as the principal prosecution witness, and was found guilty.

***



1929 – Ethel LewisSt. Joseph, Michigan

Two demented mothers who murdered their five children confessed to killing their newborns. Mrs. Okal Gorham, 25, said the babies were poisoned or strangled to death by herself and her mother, Mrs. Ethel Lewis, 57. she could give no reason for the acts but said she and her mother frequently quarreled over family matters.

***



Landlady, a Hungarian immigrant took out insurance on her immigrant tenants and is suspected of many murders. Her son was implicated in pushing one of them from a window, witnessed by a man and a small girl, after poison failed to killed him.

***


1933 – Dorothy Irene Turley – St. John, Arizona

Mattie Turley, 15, shot her father in the back with a shotgun, having been encouraged by her mother, Mrs. Dorothea Irene Turley, who had convinced the daughter that the spirit world had required the act, having used a Ouija Board session to elicit the death order. Mattie understood, she declared, that “mother must be freed in order to marry the handsome cowboy.”

***


“I’ll buy you a car if you help me kill your Uncle Robert,” Mrs. May Carey, 52, told her sons Howard and James. They did it and – but not until eight years later – one of them got hanged along with their murder-coaching mom.

***



In prison since 1928, serving a long term for car theft which she committed with her son, Earl De Costa Mayer, a crime for which he also was also in prison, 73-year old, Mary (alias “Shoebox Annie” French) confessed to the murder of the car’s owner, plus three earlier murders, all four murders committed in league with her son. As soon as Mayer learned he was to be prosecuted for murder he committed suicide.

***



Chloe Davis, 11, was ordered by her mother, Lolita Davis – who had just seconds before beaten to death with a hammer the little girl’s siblings Daphne, 10, and Deborah, 7 – to beat her little brother Mark, 3, and the mother herself with the weapon. A coroner’s jury decided Mark died from his mother’s blows – not Chloe’s – and that Mrs. Davis died after slashing her own wrists.

***



During the trial of Leonarda Cianciulli for murdering three women in succession and cooking their body parts to make soap and desserts, the prosecution made an effort to prove that without assistance a woman could not overpower his victims, dismember the bodies and transport them. Leonarda, however, stood by her story that she committed the crimes alone and that her son, Joseph Pansardi,  had no involvement. A 2008 documentary film, La saponificatrice- Vita di Leonarda Cianciulli, argues that the murderess did indeed have Joseph as her accomplice and that Leonarda lied to protect him and was indeed successful in achieving that end.

***



Mrs. Gertrude Inez Brennan and two of her sons,  Raymond, 23, and Robert, 16, killed 2 men she met through “lonely hearts club” letters. The men were shot in the head buried in a pigpen on the Brenan farm; later the bodies were dug up, burned and scattered on the city dump.

***



Asthmatic 16-year-old Sylvia Likens was tortured for months by her foster mother, her own children and neighborhood children, and eventually killed. She was beaten, had cirarettes put out on her skin, was forced to undress in the living room and insert an empty Coke bottle into private parts. After the beatings, Sylvia was forced into a scalding hot bath so she would be "cleansed of her sins." She was severely beaten and burned for wetting her mattress while asleep. She was thrown down the cellar stairs and locked in, given crackers for food and refused the right to use a bathroom. Gertrude Baniszewski announced to her children that Sylvia was a "prostitute, and she's proud of it; so we'll just put it on her stomach." She took a large needle and began to carve the words "I'm a prostitute and proud of it!" into Sylvia's stomach.

***


1972 – Carolyn Elizabeth McCrary– Santa Barbara, Ca. – Ginger McCrary Taylor, 22, daughter; Carolyn McCrary, 45.

“Mrs. McCrary is one in a family of five being questioned about a variety of crimes across the nation, including about 22 murders. Currently she is serving a nine-month sentence for harboring her son and husband in a supermarket robbery in Santa Barbara.”

***


It was a feminist murder – committed in the heyday of post-1960s women’s lib and involving four adult women and one 13-year-old girl, in a plot led by the wife of targeted optometrist John Bradford. The motive, as expressed by one of the killers, 18-year-old optometry assistant Joyce Cummings: “All we wanted was an all-female lab.” The pre-planned excuse was to be a concocted self-defense by a battered wife. The climax of the crime was when Priscilla Bradford ordered her daughter (from a previous marriage) to beat her bloodied, but still-alive, step-father with the iron skillet, the iconic feminist weapon, on the head.

***



In 1963 Theresa Jimmie Cross murdered the first of her three husbands. She was acquitted in a Sacramento, California court of murder on the basis of a fake self-defense claim. She married Robert Knorr, had four children with him and, in 1970, divorced him and undermined her children’s access to their father. She became increasingly abusive to the children, with constant beatings, escalating into tantrums in which she threw steak knives at them and put a gun to the head of her youngest child, Terry, threatening to kill her. Mom also stabbed and on another occasion shot Suesan, the bullet remaining in her body until the day before her murder. She forced her children to assist her in the brutal beatings of the chosen victim. When it came time to murder Suesan on June 16, 1984, she ordered the girl’s brothers William and Robert to burn their sister alive. Almost exactly a year later, on June 21, 1985, Sheila, whom her mother had forced to prostitute herself to raise cash for mom, died after having been beaten and tortured and locked in a closet for three days. It was not until 1993 that she was finally charged with the murders. To avoid the death penalty she pleaded guilty on October 17, 1995 and received a sentence of two consecutive life terms.

***

1995 – Tene-Bimbo Gypsy Clan– San Francisco, Ca. – Mother & daughter.


It was known to many the “Gypsy Sweetheart Scam,” by its many victims, all defrauded, but not all murdered. But between 1983 and 1995, after a group of five deaths came to be linked to a Gypsy family’s murder-for-profit scheme San Francisco police gave the name “Foxglove” to the case – after the suspected death tool, digitalis, a heart medicine derived from the foxglove flower. Six elderly men were apparently murdered soon after being married much younger women, all members of the Tene-Bimbo Gypsy clan, based in San Francisco. It is suspected each was killed through poisoning with digitalis (heart medication). Suspects arrested in the scam were Angela Tene Bufford; her mother, Mary Tene Steiner, of San Francisco, and, in New York, Sylvia Mitchell.


***


1996 – Anjanabai & daughters: Renuka Kiran Shinde, Seema Mohan GavitPune, Kolhapur & Nashik, Maharashtra, India– 

The family mother, 2 daughters and son-in-law kidnapped and murdered 9 infants and toddlers. The gang made ransom demands in some instances and used the children as props in petty thievery schemes. some victims were starved to death, others were murdered brutally by smashing them into telephone poles.

***

1996 – Ludmilla (Lyudmila) Spesivtsev– Novosibirsk, Siberia – Mother and son, cannibalism


Lyudmila Spesivtseva, an employee of a Soviet government school, was sentenced to life in prison (or 13 years according to some accounts) for luring teenage girls for the pleasure of her son, Sasha, so that he could rape, torture and dismember them. The mother cooked the remains and served them up to her son. It is estimated that the number of teenage female victims numbers up to 80.

***



***


2000 – Lohstroh / Geisler case – Friendswood, Texas

A 10-year-old boy, who suffered from severe parental alienation induced by his mother, Deborah Geisler, of Texas, shot his father, Rick Lohstroh, with his mother’s gun in the back at the beginning of a parental “visitation.” Two years later his younger brother described the event: “When I was eight my DAD died ... I was scared! My mom told my brother to shot [sic] my DAD but my grandparents came to help me."

***

Li Huijie, from the central province of Henan, is accused of killing all four of her husbands in a two-year period on the orders of her mother, Tian Xueqin, for the "bride price" paid by rural grooms.

***


A woman (name not disclosed)  and her two young adult sons murdered a neighbor then cooked and ate his body.

***


2005 – Shirin Gul – Kabul & Jalalabad, Afghanistan

Shirin Gul, her lover Rahmatullah, her 18-year-old son and four others murdered 27 men and robbed them in addition to killing her husband, the father of her son..

***


2010 – Eva Cummings – North Collins, New York

51-year-old Eva Cummings and her 31-year-old son, Luke Wright – mentally retarded and marginally functional – were charged in the death of the woman’s 23-year-old severely mentally disabled daughter who investigators said was repeatedly raped, beaten and scalded and had her face pushed into feces.

***



Silvia Meraz, leader of a small human sacrifice cult, comprising family members exclusively it would seem, was arrested, along with seven other family members, for the kidnapping, torture and murders of three persons, ritually sacrificed in 2009, 2010, 2012. Prosecutors say they believe the actual killings were done by Silvia and her son, Ramon.

***


2013 – Diane Staudte – Springfield, Missouri

This mother-daughter serial killer team engaged in a homicidal house-cleaning project using antifreeze, a deadly poison,  as their tool. The serial poisoner mom told detective that she chose to terminate the life of her husband Mark because she “hated him.” Her son Shawn deserved to diebecause he was “worse than a pest.” Daughter Sarah, who survived the attempt on her life, barely, was deemed not fit to live because she “would not get a job and had student loans that had to be paid.”

***


2013 – Inessa Tarverdiyeva– Stavropol region, Russia



A serial killer family: husband, sister & daughter as accomplices, with an estimated 30 or more victims.

***

Li Huijie & Tian Xueqin: Chinese Champion Black Widow Serial Killer & Her Murder-Coach Mom - 2001

$
0
0


FULL TEXT (Article 1 of 2): Hong Kong – Chinese police have arrested a young woman on suspicion of murder after she was widowed for the fourth time in two years.

Li Huijie, from the central province of Henan, is accused of killing all her husbands on the orders of her mother, Tian Xueqin, for the "bride price" paid by rural grooms. Li and her mother were held when police were told that her last husband, Huang Zhiqiang, 25, died three days after his wedding from rat poison.

[David Rennie, “Widow ‘killed all four husbands,’”The Telegraph (London, England), Feb. 9, 2001]

***

FULL TEXT (Article 2 of 2): Beijing.– Two Chinese women - a mother and a daughter - was arrested on a wedding-scam designed to grab up expensive wedding gifts, leading to the discovery of the suspicious deaths of four grooms.

Huijie Li and her mother, Tian Xuejin, were  arrested in Henan province, after four young men in the period of two years had been killed by with rat poison.

Suspicion took root after Li's last husband, Huang Zhigiang (25), died three days after their wedding on 21 January.An autopsy determined that he was killed by rat poison.

After police found a large quantity of rat poison in Tian's house got, Li admitted that she and her mother Huang killed the man she married.

Then it came to light that her last three husbands all too soon after their marriage died of poisoning.

Li's first marriage was in January 1999 with Huang Guofu.

After that she and Ma Fu Gualiang Xinhai married.

Each of these grooms brought large wedding gifts into Li’s possession.

[“Two arrested rat poison to four bridegrooms,” AFP, Feb. 9, 2001]


***

 

For links to other cases of woman who murdered 2 or more husbands (or paramours), see Black Widow Serial Killers.

***


For similar cases, see Murder-Coaching Moms

***

Marie Petti, British “Ultra-feminist - 1922

$
0
0

FULL TEXT (Article 1 of 2): London, May 6. – “Man is but one of a million humble fertilizers. Nature intended woman to reign supreme.”

Marie Petti, leader of a secret ultra-feminist movement that has sprung up throughout the British Isles, today voiced this slogan of the new organization.

Although still clandestine, the organization is reported to have gained tremendously in membership and influence since first it was promulgated a month ago. It aims to restore womankind to its “rightful place.”

Miss Petti was asked by the United Press to state the beliefs on which her movement is based.

“Modern man,” she replied, “in his pose of superiority, is but a mere contemptible imposter, who must be subdued. Woman’s superiority has been scientifically established.

“At the beginning of organic life, woman, created man, and ruled him. He was a parasite, and a slave.”

“At best, man is but an afterthought of nature.”

At secret meetings of the new movement, a charter, based on data from the days before woman fell, is being drawn up, Miss Petti declared. She said at these meetings, any mention of the word man or anything masculine was hissed.

[William M. Sweets, “Man Is A Mere Imposter And Woman Is Supreme, Says Ultra-Feminist Head,” syndicated (UP), The Pittsburgh Press (Pa.), May 7, 1922, p. 1]

***


FULL TEXT (Article 2 of 2)

~ Tenets of Man-Haters ~

London. – Mere man is about to be swept off the face of the earth if “ultra-feminists” have their way, Elliott O’Donnell, author and investigator of distinction, informs the International News Service.

The tenets of the ”ultra-feminists” who are organized to unthrone man, are, according to O’Donnell, as follows:

“In the beginning there was only one sex, the feminine – man was a mistake, a mere afterthought.”

“There is no need for any sex other than the feminine.”

“Love between the sexes is only weakness, temporary madness.”

Life begins as female, life is feminine.”

“Parthenogenesis or virgin birth proves the oneness at the substance out of which all things are made.”

***



***

LONDON – A feminine war against the male sex is well under way to Great Britain, according to Elliott O’Donnell English author and investigator.

O’Donnell, who is the author of more than 30 books on psychic matters and who has established a reputation run an Investigator of haunted houses, is Irish by birth but in reality an American product, for his family nettled in Baltimore more than a century ago, and ho spent the early days of his youth on a ranch in Oregon.

For many years O’Donnell has been looked upon as one of the leaders of those who are trying to lay the truth about things supernatural before the public. His adventure in investigating ghost stories and haunted places are widely read in England, but now he has given up his investigations of things supernatural to take up the investigation of the efforts of certain ultra-feminists to bring about the downfall of man.

This English investigator informed the International News Service that he is in possession of absolute evidence that “ultra-feminists”are laying plans for a sex war in England, and he has no doubt that their organization extends to the United States.

“I am not making a hostile attack on women,” O’Donnell said. “For women, as women, I have always had the greatest respect and admiration. I have always held that it is only fair and right that women should enjoy the same privileges, an a advantages as men.”

“I am convinced, however, from my investigations that the cult of man-hating is being fostered by a very definite organization in London.”

“Secret meetings, from which men are rigidly banned, are being held repeatedly, and the doctrine of male hatred is subtly but vigorously propounded.”

“The chief aims and objects of the movement are in the field of politics and economics.”

“The ultra-feminists are particularly anxious to gain control over the police.”

“If the cult of man-hating goes on increasing until it gains ascendency, even were it possible to propagate the race without the assistance of the male, the end of the world would be assured.”

“In the past history of the human race sex hate and antagonisms have been the prelude to great national catastrophes, and I venture to suggest that this nation would take heed lest a like fate befall it. There is nothing constructive in ultra feminism; it is destructive from start to finish.”

O’Donnell declared that the are of three types, as follows:

1. The type that apes the masculine.

2. The anaemic, fretful type of woman.

3. The patently abnormal woman.

Dissemination of the cult of the “ultra-feminists” is being accomplished by propaganda, O’Donnell charges.

[“London Women Would Oust Men - Clan of Man-Haters Seeks to Sweep Males Prom Face of Earth,” syndicated, Tulsa world (Ok), Apr. 30, 1922, p. 14]

***


***


For more cases of misandric fixation see: What Is Misandric Fixation?

***

Gertie Kidd-Williams, Oklahoma Serial Husband-Killer - 1914

$
0
0

FULL TEXT: Wagoner. March 2. – Gertie Kidd-Williams shot and killed her husband John Williams in their home here Saturday night. This is the third husband Gertie has killed. She is a negress with quite a reputation for shooting both in Muskogee and Wagoner counties.

There was a gathering of negroes at .he William home A dispute arose between the woman and her husband and it is alleged he picked up a stove leg and started towards her with It A hen she whipped out her trusty husband killer and shot him dead. The bullet entered just beneath his chin and went through his neck.

Four years ago the Williams woman shot and killed her second husband, a negro named Alberty who was for several years a cab driver in Muscogee. It was about ten years ago that she shot and killed her first husband. In each instance she pleaded self defense and escaped conviction, it is understood she will plead self defense in the present case.

It was also reported here that a negro named Dee had been fatally hurt in a fight at Gibson Station last night but the officials have been unable to get any further information.

[“Gertie Kidd-Williams Adds No. 3 To Her List Of Husbands She Has Killed—John Williams Was The Last,” Muskogee Times-Democrat (Ok.), Mar. 2, 1914, p. 1]

***

 

For links to other cases of woman who murdered 2 or more husbands (or paramours), see Black Widow Serial Killers.

***

http://unknownmisandry.blogspot.com/2012/11/female-serial-killers-of-africa-african.html


***

Karina Rybalkina, Siberian Black Widow Serial Killer - 2009

$
0
0


Following is a painfully garbled automatically translated text, which until the original Russian text can be located and properly translated will serve as a temporary record of the case.

It is not clear whether “Karina Rybalkina” is a pseudonym or is the true name of the woman who, at the age of 43, was convicted for her third husband-killing, the first occuring in 1992. All three murders were, according to her statements committed in a drunken state, with a kitchen knife as her weapon.

***

[“The Siberian killing three husbands, have sentenced to 12 years of a colony,” Rus News Journal, 2009?]

Within the precincts of court Karina Rybalkina (the name and a surname are changed - the Comment red.) Already feels at home, unless hides the person from cameras. As if being afraid that after once again leaves on freedom, grooms will avoid it. And it is not sophisticated: the lady in the 45 years already has had time to kill three husbands! With all finished under the same scheme - a kitchen knife.   today in court   October area heard case about last victim " the black widow ".

Karina Vasilevna killed Nikolay Gubin`s roommate, - state accuser Lilija Pavlova tells.

All that was jealous of him of own daughter. Killed also as well as two previous spouses. Here once again also has got under a consequence.

In a word, that Karina Vasilevna still the femme fatale. All her life, judging by criminal case materials, passes in wedding efforts, short and rough matrimonial vanity and " to rest " behind a lattice. And all has begun in Easter feast in 1992 - m to year …

Has killed in the face of children

… On the occasion of a feast of Karina together with the first spouse drank. Have drunk much so the husband was cut down and has fallen asleep. Karine had no time for a dream, and she has decided to walk, and at the same time and to walk a dog. In the street has rowed to the neighbour, same poddatym on the occasion of Easter. Shouts of Kariny have forced the husband to jump out on street. Only " under distribution " have got both impudent the neighbour, and the wife. Having given out to all punches, the husband has again left to sleep. Karinu, the behaviour of the spouse has touched, it from a threshold has gone into the spouse the next scandal. It was fastened taburetno - the knife fight, in which blagovernyj beginning "the black widow " has fallen zamertvo in the face of small children. Karina on the court first in the life has told:

“I do not remember, how killed, can, he has come across a knife, after all drunk were.”

Then Karina have denounced for 4 years of a colony of a high security. But it and was not corrected, leaving on freedom - it has again seized for a knife …

"It is all she is Karina …"

Karina long has not grieved on ubiennomu to the husband and as soon as left on freedom, at once has found to itself the new significant other - Gennady (the name is changed for ethical reasons - the Bus Comment). However, and with it has lived soul in soul not long. On the night of Hellouin (you only estimate coincidence!) Karina killed the new spouse also a kitchen knife. That evening three friends, and Karinu stayed with them as if itself it is the devil`s work - it at the live second husband has started to make advances at once to all fair company. Gennady of the such has not suffered - the next scandal has begun.

Visitors zasobiralis, and Gennady has gone to see off them. And Karina has run on kitchen … behind a knife. When there has arrived the militia, the bleeding profusely man only and has croaked:

is all it...

On court Karina has not caused a stir originality and has told the same, as on the first:

- I do not remember, how killed. Drunk was.

to It a distance of 10 years. Children

- then still small Olju and Kostju have given to children`s home.
"has killed the husband, having been jealous of him of the daughter"

Recently Karina again left on freedom and has found to itself the husband in the name of Nikolay Gubin. Joint wine parties, scandals, quarrels - all it was ordinary life of a newly appeared cell of a society. Together with Karinoj and Nikolay a vein and the daughter from first marriage of Olja. From - for it also there was all this leapfrog. Militiamen only also had time to leave in the house in the street Knitted where lived this strange family. That, Karina will attack on a daughter Olju will be attacked by her brother Kostja with a knife and words

- do not pull down happiness of mother!

mum suspected Olju of relations with the beloved Nikolay and in any way could not will calm down. Akkurat before new 2009 the situation was absolutely heated. Karina and Nikolay have drunk, then " the black widow " again - taki took in hands a knife and killed from - for stupid jealousy of the spouse. Then has run up to the daughter - and pyrnula a knife and it. The girl has survived, and the next spouse " the black widow " - is not present.

… On court Karina the fault in murder of the third husband under the bill and did not recognise, Asserted that Nikolay was killed by Olga, and then was wounded in a chest that the suspicion has not fallen on it. However, at Office of Public Prosecutor other opinion.

is an obvious relapse, - state accuser Lilija Pavlova speaks. - -   Having been drunk, Karina Vasilevna has once again finished with the spouse.

Even judges admitted: it is terrible to think, how much still husbands zamuchaet and will be killed by this woman. psihologo - psychiatric examination has once again shown that Karina is made, yet will not drink... And the court has sentenced it to 12 years of a standard regime penal colony:

- the Sentence she has conceived more, than emotionally, for a long time we such did not see, - representatives of court have told. - the woman shouted that business is fabricated. Was indignant that her have denounced. Unless did not cry, to all - taki sentences to it to listen not in the first …

[“The Siberian killing three husbands, have sentenced to 12 years of a colony,” Rus News Journal, 2009?]

***

 

For links to other cases of woman who murdered 2 or more husbands (or paramours), see Black Widow Serial Killers.

***

“Disabled Veteran-Targeting Black Widow” & Her 4 Kills

$
0
0

NOTE: At this time the case described below has not been identified. It is of great interest not only in that it represents a “champion black widow” case (4 or more husbands killed) but also for the fact that the killer targeted disabled veterans to exploit and murder.

***

EXCERPT: Victor [O. Rice] is at a competitive disadvantage just now, because he has only been Norfolk State's police chief since Nov. 1, after applying for the job at his younger brother's suggestion. William has served on the ODU force since 1987, and as chief since 1991.

Victor spent most of his 25-year New York City police career as a homicide detective, the creme de la creme of investigators, while Williams rocketed into police administration. He served 21 years.

Victor solved the case of a New York woman who'd murdered four husbands, all disabled veterans, in different states. After the fourth murder, she told Victor her husband had been done in - slashed ear to ear - by one of three men who'd been drinking with him. Four half-filled glasses were on the table, but there were no wet marks on it. After Victor pointed out to the woman that each man could not have placed his glass in exactly the same spot time after time, she broke down and confessed.



[Byline: The Virginian-Pilot, “Two Brothers In Blue Secure Norfolk Schools; Ex-new York Cops Still Can't Resist Sibling Rivalry,” Daily Press (Hampton Roads, Va.), Jan. 8, 1995]

***

 

For links to other cases of woman who murdered 2 or more husbands (or paramours), see Black Widow Serial Killers.

***

Beatriz Perez, Texas Black Widow 2007

$
0
0

FULL TEXT (Article 1 of 2): Four years ago, Beatriz Perez received probation when she admitted to trying to kill her husband with a poisoned sandwich after accusing him of having an affair.

On Wednesday, the 49-year-old woman sat in a Bexar County courtroom again - this time accused of bludgeoning to death a new husband.

Police found Army veteran Juan Abitu, 73, soaked in blood in his small garage apartment in San Antonio's historic Monticello Park neighborhood Aug. 23, 2007.

Perez, who had been served with divorce papers two days earlier, left town later that afternoon, witnesses said. She wasn't seen again until four weeks later, when she was arrested crossing the border into Eagle Pass, prosecutor Michael De Leon told jurors during opening statements in her murder trial.

"Instead of going to her husband's funeral, Beatriz Perez packed up everything and moved to Mexico on the day of the murder," De Leon said, pointing out that a strand of her hair was found on Abitu's body.

The murder weapon was never found, but a deputy medical examiner said Wednesday that Abitu suffered multiple head fractures.

Also on Wednesday, prosecutors displayed on the courtroom wall a large photo of Abitu's blood-smeared left hand, where investigators said they found a long, wavy hair traced to Perez.

Lawyers for Perez countered that the hair was inconsequential. Although the couple had been separated since February 2007, two months after they were married, they still had feelings for each other and often visited, defense attorney Jay Norton said.

"Reason and common sense will show you a lot of the state's case is built upon assumption - a house of cards," Norton said. "This really quite honestly is a sloppy investigation."

Attorneys didn't mention Perez's previous conviction to the jury of eight women and four men. Perez told police in 2003 that she put eight pills of Ativan, a sedative, in a tuna sandwich she made for Jose Perez. They had been married for 22 years and had three children.

Two years before that incident, she had tried the same scheme using fewer pills, but all it did was make her husband sleepy, she told police.

Outside the courtroom Wednesday, defense attorney Alan Brown said the old case and the current one are completely different.

"This is head trauma, a violent act," he said. "Our thinking is that it's so much different from (the 2003 case) that it shows she's innocent of this."

[Craig Kapitan,“Woman on trial in black widow murder plot,” MySA (San Antonio, Tx.), Nov. 4, 2009]

***

FULL TEXT (Article 2 of 2): Jurors returned a guilty verdict Monday in the trial of a San Antonio woman whose 73-year-old husband was found beaten to death two days after she was served with divorce papers.

It wasn't until after the punishment phase of Beatriz Perez's murder trial began that the panel learned that the 49-year-old defendant was already on probation for aggravated assault - having admitted to police in 2005 that she twice tried to poison a previous husband.

Perez could face up to life in prison for the death of Juan Abitu, a Green Beret and Vietnam veteran described by relatives as the rock that held their family together.

Closing arguments for the punishment hearing are expected this morning in the 226th District Court.

Defense attorneys described Perez during the weeklong trial as someone who was prone to anxiety - so much so that it wasn't surprising she fled to a family home in Piedras Negras, Mexico, immediately after discovering her husband's body while peering through the locked screen door of his Monticello Park apartment on the morning of Aug. 23, 2007.

Perez was apprehended a month later as she crossed the border into Eagle Pass.

"I looked up and I saw a lot of blood - too much blood," Perez told jurors through an interpreter while on the witness stand Friday. "I was very, very scared. I just hadn't seen something like that ever."

She said she didn't know who killed her husband but feared the assailant might be after her, too. The two were still in love, Perez said, adding that the divorce had been planned as a way to appease her children, who didn't get along with Abitu.

Abitu's murder was more likely a random occurrence, her attorney, Alan Brown, added during closing arguments.

"Burglaries are rampant throughout this city," Brown said. "I don't know what happened here. But I really don't believe this woman - 4 foot 11 - did that to this Green Beret."

But Perez worked construction, prosecutor Michael De Leon later countered. He pointed to testimony from a deputy medical examiner that anybody could have inflicted such wounds, given the right instrument. A murder weapon was never recovered.

If it was a burglary, he said, it seems odd that Abitu's gold watch, ring, car keys and a couple hundred dollars in cash were left on his body. Perez was the only person with a motive, and her actions spoke louder than words that day, De Leon told jurors.

"If your husband, or your wife, is lying on the floor in a pool of blood ... any decent human being is going to call for help," he said. "You don't bolt for the border."

[Craig Kapitan, “Woman found guilty of murdering husband,”MySA (San Antonio, Tx Nov. 9, 2009]

***

 

For links to other cases of woman who murdered 2 or more husbands (or paramours), see Black Widow Serial Killers.

***

Inuit Black Widow of the 1920s - Canada

$
0
0


EXCERPT: In another telling story, Grace O’Kelly described an Inuit woman being held at the police barracks with a male and female accomplice who had aided her in strangling two previous husbands. She was an old woman, remarked Mrs O’Kelly, who had eluded capture by making doglike tracks in the snow. Mrs Kelly was impressed by this clever manoeuvre, and intrigued by the third husband who “seemed mot devoted and could be found sitting in their tent with his arm around his lady love, or holding her hand as he walked.” It is not clear if the Inuit woman murdered her first two husbands so she could marry the third, although it is apparent that Mrs O’Kelly believed that to be the case and that she was more envious than damning of the woman. She also noted that this behavior was the only form of lovemaking she had “witnessed among the stolid, and apparently unresponsive natives of these coasts.”

[Barbara E. Kelcy,“Alone in Silence: European Women in the Canadian North before World War II,” 2001, McGill-Queens University Press, p. 152; Kelcy’s account is based on: Grace O’Kelly, “A Woman’s Arctic Log.” Parts 1, 2 and 3. Beaver 4, No. 6 (1924): 210; 4, no. 7 (1924); 4, no. 8 (1924): 295.]

***

Note: Ms. Kelcy refers to the question of whether the suspect “murdered her first two husbands so she could marry the third.” This phrasing implies that somehow the murder of no. 1 would be connected to her aim to marry no. 3, yet there is no explanation of this peculiar set of circumstances. The answer to the conundrum will likely be found in the original 1924 source, not a present accessible to us.

***

 

For links to other cases of woman who murdered 2 or more husbands (or paramours), see Black Widow Serial Killers.

***

David Futrelle: Hero(ine)

$
0
0


David Futrelle is a famous expert on the notion that the sexes are mere “social constructions,” a condition that is the result of millennia of unspeakable oppression (24/7) of the female social construction community by members of the male social construction community.

David Futrelle saves damsels from oppressors who attempt to deploy reason, facts, historical documents and other weapons of mass oppression. He is truly a modern knight in shining fur.

David Futrelle is very, very interested in the topic of rape (both as a true crime writer and a fiction writer), and thus frequently writes about rape.

He has a blog called “We Hunted the Mammoth.” It used to be called “Man Boobs.” His blogs are BIG on the internet (hence the references to bigness in the blog names he chooses).

He hates “the patriarchy” and he loves people who cook up “theories” that will provide a schema for eradicating every last atom of patriarchy from the planet – by any means necessary.

David Furelle is famous. Almost as famous as Big Red (with whom, rumor has it, he shares a body -- called by those who stalk that elusive being -- Redfoot).

***

Vintage Futrelle fan art:


***

Rudduah’s Serial Killing Prostitute Gang – India 1861

$
0
0

A group of prostitutes led by a woman named Ruddah was arrested, prosecuted, convicted and sentenced to death. Two of her girls, Bilassee, Parbuttee were also sentenced to death. Another prostitute in the ring Mussamut Soomerkee was given a lesser sentence. The prostitutes had been recruited by a professional poisoner, pseudo-Rajah Zalim Sing, to exploit their opportunities as prostitutes to poison their customers and rob them.

It was later found that technical errors were made in their trials, though the court did indeed find that the defendants were indeed professional poisoners.

***

Following are some excerpts from a long and complex account of the case:

EXCERPTS: The disclosure here made caused considerable excitement and horror in the city of Benares.


I now consider how far Captain Watson's enquiries lead to the belief of the existence, at a former period, of an organised gang under pseudo-Rajah Zalim Sing. Both Brij Bussia and Chowrassia (who was named by Brij Bussia) state that they were employed by Zalim Sing and his wife, known as the Ranee Lulloo, to commit robberies by the administration of dhatoora and khurreearee (the latter is, I believe, a preparation from the root of the Nerum odoratum or sweet-scented oleander, the medicinal properties of which are described in the new Indian Gardener as follows: The bark of the root and leaves externally applied are by native doctors considered repellants, the root taken internally being poisonous!)

Amongst the persons denounced by Brij Bussia were two women, Rudduah of Ramnuggur, and a servant of hers named Soomerkhee, a prostitute, "poisoners by trade." Subsequent enquiries proved that here again her story was true.Both were apprehended. In Rudduah's house a large quantity of dhatoora, khurreearee, arsenic, and other poisons were found, both in the raw and in a prepared state. Soomerkhee, on being apprehended, and on being confronted with Brij Bussia, made a clean confession of her crimes, declaring that Rudduah was the employer of Bilassee andParbuttee, prostitutes, being in the Dal Hurdoee Mohullah, who destroyed by poison those decoyed into the brothel and then plundered their property.

[Selections from the Records of the Government of India, Home Revenue And Agricultural Department. No. CLXVII. Papers Relating To The Crime Of Robbery By Poisoning. Calcutta: Office Of The Superintendent Of Government Printing. 1880]

***


For similar cases, see: Female Serial Killer Bandits

***

False Rape Accusation as a Political Weapon – June Kelly’s Lie - 1944

$
0
0

FULL TEXT (Article 1 of 3): New York, Aug. 4 – Edwin P. Banta, 75, was held in $1,900 bail for trial on Sept. 11 today on a charge of conspiring to have a false charge of attempted rape brought against Arthur Derounian, on the theory it would "blow that sedition trial in Washington sky-high."

According to District Attorney Frank S. Hogan Banta was a friend of George Sylvester Viereck, one of the defendants in the sedition case.

Derounian, who under the pen-name of John Roy Carlson, wrote the best-selling “Under Cover” has been a key witness for the prosecution.

Hogan charged that Banta, an orator for the German American Bund [U. S. organization formed by the German National Socialist Party, commonly known as the Nazis] when that organization was flourishing, posed as a violent anti-Nazi and recently succeeded in obtaining a job as investigator for the anti-Nazi league.

Banta's motive in taking that position, Hogan declared, was in the hope of aiding Viereck and other defendants in Washington. Banta enlisted June Kelly, 21, according to the district attorney, who said she was induced to bring a charge of attempted rape against Derounian.

When questioned, she admitted the charge was false. She was named as co-conspirator in the information on which Banta was arraigned yesterday but was not a defendant.

Banta denied the charge contending he was the victim of a of the Anti-Nazi league.

[“Hold Banta On False Charge Conspiracy,” Dunkirk Evening Observer (N.Y.), Aug. 4, 1944, p. 3]

***

FULL TEXT (Article 2 of 3): New York, Oct. 18 – Special sessions court seeks today to learn the source of $1,000 which was promised red-haired June Kelly, 21, if she would accuse John Roy Carson [pseudonym of Arthur Derounian], author of “Under Cover,” of rape in an alleged conspiracy to “blow the Washington sedition trial to hell.”

Miss Kelly testified yesterday that Edwin P. Banta, 73, alleged master mind of the plot, told her he would “write to Rep. Fish (Hamilton Fish, R., N. Y.), Mr. Deatherage (George E. Deatherage, organizer of the Knights of the White Camelia) and a Mr. Robinett (of Chicago) about raising money.”

Carlson is to be a government witness in the trial of 29 alleged seditionists which has dragged for weeks in a federal court in Washington.

Miss Kelly testified that she had been Banta’s secretary, and that he visited her room the night of June 19. “I told him Carlson had been to see me and he got very excited. He said ‘I have a great idea. You see he raped you and we will blow the sedition trial at Washington all to hell.”

Banta told Miss Kelly he had informed New York’s police commissioner Lewis J. Valentine of Carlson’s “attack” on her, she said, and a deputy chief inspector called to hear her story, which she told while Banta sat in the bathroom of her apartment within earshot.

“Banta told me to tear my dress, scratch my arms and shed tears when I told my story to the inspector,” Miss Kelly testified. She said she refused tear her dress because it was new, but she did accuse Carlson, and later telephoned police to say the story was “a frameup instigated by Banta.”

[“Probe Plot To Disrupt Trial of 29,” syndicated (UP), The Vidette-Messenger (Valparaiso, In.), Oct. 18, 1944, p. 3]

***

FULL TEXT (Article 3 of 3): New York, Oct. 23 – Edwin P. Banta, 73, was found guilty on a charge of conspiracy in an attempt to discredit Arthur Derounian, author of “Under Cover,” by asking a girl to falsely accuse the writer of raping her.

Presiding justice Irving Ben Cooper of Special Sessions announced sentence would be imposed Nov. 9 after “a full investigation of this defendant.”

Banta, faced with a maximum sentence of three years imprisonment, was accused of asking June Kelly, a pretty red-haired girl, to make the false accusation against Derounian, who wrote under the name John Roy Carlson, in order to “blow the seditionist trial in Washington all to hell.”

[“Found Guilty Of Attempt To Smear Carson,” The Gazette and Daily (York, Pa.), Oct. 24, 1944, p. 6]

***


***


More historical cases of False Rape Accusations

***
Viewing all 1778 articles
Browse latest View live